Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Dutch team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/nl.po
(We can arrange things so that
Le 29/10/2022 à 15:02, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Just curious: Wouldn't be Wilbert's 'parce' library (used for the code
highlighter in Frescobaldi) a more sophisticated alternative?
Originally, I wanted to have LilyPond support in Pygments
because it is used in Sphinx and MkDocs as well as on
Le 29/10/2022 à 06:34, Ian Kelling a écrit :
I have an update. A lists.gnu.org user from emacs helped me identify
some occasional backlogs that were happening, causing 2 - 3 hour delays
of some messages every once in a while. I've done a deep dive into the
performance of the system, identified so
> The problem is that "violin" is also the name of a clef: [...]
Ah, yes, thanks. Will fix the example.
> [...] in general the Pygments lexer would have to be far smarter in
> order to distinguish cases where a particular word is used as a
> user-defined name vs. those where it should be highlig
Le 29/10/2022 à 10:25, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Please have a look at the attached image; it's taken from the LM,
chapter 3.1.4. As can be seen, `_` and `-` are bold, and `^` isn't.
Is it possible to make `_` and `-` bold only if used as articulation
(i.e., *after* `[_^-]`)?
The relevant pat
Le 29/10/2022 à 11:06, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Please have a look at the attached image, taken from the LM section
3.4.1. As can be seen, the second variable ('cello') is bold, while
the first one ('violin') isn't. Can this be fixed?
~/repos/lilypond $ cat test.ly
violin = #'foo
cello = #'
Please have a look at the attached image, taken from the LM section
3.4.1. As can be seen, the second variable ('cello') is bold, while
the first one ('violin') isn't. Can this be fixed?
Werner
Please have a look at the attached image; it's taken from the LM,
chapter 3.1.4. As can be seen, `_` and `-` are bold, and `^` isn't.
Is it possible to make `_` and `-` bold only if used as articulation
(i.e., *after* `[_^-]`)?
Werner
