Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 9/27/21, 3:52 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
> behalf of d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Jean Abou Samra writes:
>
> > is not entirely true: once a function is defined, it can be
> > relied on internally. Imagine my embarrassment when I had
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> I *think* it means a token of lookahead is required
> after most curly braces, which *may* have consequences
> on synchronization between lexer and parser around mode
> boundaries — at any rate, parser.yy contains the comment
>
> // We must not have lookahead tokens pars
On 9/27/21, 3:52 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
wrote:
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> is not entirely true: once a function is defined, it can be
> relied on internally. Imagine my embarrassment when I had to
> explain on -user-fr the cause of the error occur
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> is not entirely true: once a function is defined, it can be
> relied on internally. Imagine my embarrassment when I had to
> explain on -user-fr the cause of the error occurring with
> the code (minimized here):
>
> cons = \markup \tiny "conséquent"
>
> {
> \stemDown
>
Le 25/09/2021 à 17:25, Dan Eble a écrit :
On Sep 25, 2021, at 06:32, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
"\*" =
#(define-music-function (n mus) (index? ly:music?)
#{ \repeat $repeat-shorthand $n { #mus } #})
Instead of debating a default repeat type and function, why not provide access
to repetit
