Re: new procedure with GitLab CI

2020-05-29 Thread James Lowe
Hello On 29/05/2020 18:03, Valentin Villenave wrote: -- Issues & Labels. Not that I’m particularly keen to revisit that matter here; I’ve learned my lesson and stopped trying to intervene and triage any Issues; it remains to be seen whether a) Milestones are a good fit to replace Fixed_2_x

Re: new procedure with GitLab CI

2020-05-29 Thread David Kastrup
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:04 PM Valentin Villenave > wrote: >> >> On 5/27/20, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: >> > No, "rebase" is currently manual (with "merge when pipeline succeeds" >> > being automatic). This has been clearly communicated, sorry if you >> > missed that. >>

Re: new procedure with GitLab CI

2020-05-29 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:04 PM Valentin Villenave wrote: > > On 5/27/20, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > No, "rebase" is currently manual (with "merge when pipeline succeeds" > > being automatic). This has been clearly communicated, sorry if you > > missed that. > > Hey Jonas, hey everybody; > just so

Re: new procedure with GitLab CI

2020-05-29 Thread Valentin Villenave
On 5/27/20, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > No, "rebase" is currently manual (with "merge when pipeline succeeds" > being automatic). This has been clearly communicated, sorry if you > missed that. Hey Jonas, hey everybody; just so you know, I’m getting increasingly frustrated -- as you may guess if you