Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2020, 07:57 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> In my mind, supporting GUILE 2.x means supporting byte compilation
> because we'd otherwise regress startup speed by a second or so.
>
> That is currently blocked on your proposed alternative to
> https://codereview.appspot.com
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> > Or, we could globally map new/delete to GC_malloc and GC_free.
>
> That would vastly increase the amount of GC-scanned memory, and GC
> scanning is already slow.
I'd first measure this carefully before spending time on a complex
rewrite. Th
On 5/6/20, jonas.hahnf...@gmail.com wrote:
> In case you're interested how I found out about this:
> https://www.hahnjo.de/blog/2020/05/06/recursively-timeing-processes.html
Good to know, thanks! (And the resulting improvement is indeed impressive.)
Cheers,
-- V.
In case you're interested how I found out about this:
https://www.hahnjo.de/blog/2020/05/06/recursively-timeing-processes.html
before this change (commit 8fa5191cbf)
/usr/bin/gsc called 18100 times, total of 2044s
lilypond called 937 times, total of 1120s
after an early version of this change:
/u
David Kastrup writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:49 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2020, 17:09 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> > I am currently digging back and forth regarding implementation of our
>>> > Smobs (Scheme objects) and garbage
Hi everyone,
I’m looking into doing large time sigs found in modern conducting scores in
lilypond. For that reason I need to place TimeSignatures that are not in a
Vertical axis group on the score. Is there any way to vertically align such
objects relative to the bottom of the system instead of
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:49 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2020, 17:09 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> > I am currently digging back and forth regarding implementation of our
>> > Smobs (Scheme objects) and garbage collection and STL, and I think
> On 6 May 2020, at 08:21, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> Regarding GC, once we leave behind GUILE 1.x, we could adorn all SCM
> containing structures with a operator new/operator delete, which calls
> scm_gc_alloc()/scm_gc_free(). That would get rid of marking functions.
> For vectors, we could i
