Is there a reason _not_ to use GitHub for
development/bugtracking/wiki/planning? The current dev model is, to put it
mildly, and in lack of better words, cumbersome and archaic. GNU licences are
AFAICS supported by GitHub, so that can’t be a showstopper. If we had a more
modern development mode
I just made a sequence of random bugfixes, which I cleanly committed
in separate commits, but now I discovered that get squashed on review
by git-cl.
For the moment, I've put them here,
https://github.com/hanwen/lilypond/commits/salzburg
but it would be nice to have a more Git-native review to
Hi Han-Wen
Great to have you back!
You've now got Create and Update permissions along with Read in the
SourceForge Issue Tracker.
Trevor
-- Original Message --
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys"
To: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: 17/01/2020 23:02:18
Subject: sf issue tracker access
Hi,
i'm "hanwe
It looks like https://github.com/lilypond was last updated in Jun
2019. If there was an automated mirror, it has stopped working. Could
someone give it a kick again?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Hi,
i'm "hanwen" for the sourceforge bug tracker. Could someone give me
write access?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
On 2020/01/17 07:35:45, Dan Eble wrote:
I've run some builds with a writable source directory, and I'm fine
with it.
Feel free to move forward with the cleaner change. I'll submit a
LilyDev pull
request to cope with it.
I'm not going to change this patch once more. We can keep it in mind f
