Reviewers: lemzwerg,
https://codereview.appspot.com/562710043/diff/582610043/input/regression/multi-measure-rest-text.ly
File input/regression/multi-measure-rest-text.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/562710043/diff/582610043/input/regression/multi-measure-rest-text.ly#newcode20
input/
On Apr 16, 2019, at 06:58, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
> In all these cases \fermata behaves the same as \fermataMarkup, because both
> simply create a MultiMeasureRestText. It’s placed on the first measure of
> expanded MMRs
Is that the most reasonable result or should it be treated as a known issue
Without testing: LGTM, thanks!
https://codereview.appspot.com/562710043/diff/582610043/input/regression/multi-measure-rest-text.ly
File input/regression/multi-measure-rest-text.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/562710043/diff/582610043/input/regression/multi-measure-rest-text.ly#newcod
> my third attempt to make R\fermata work (after
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-04/msg00069.html
> and
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-04/msg00079.html)
> seems to be successful:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5511/
Great!
> O
Just a heads up for those who build Guile 1.8 on Ubuntu themselves - the
new 19.04 release has an updated version of GNU readline. A simple
recompile addresses the problem of Guile failing on readline after this
upgrade.
Andrew
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Hi list,
my third attempt to make R\fermata work (after
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-04/msg00069.html
and
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-04/msg00079.html)
seems to be successful:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5511/
One of
