Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch

2019-03-21 Thread Knut Petersen
On 19.03.19 00:00, David Kastrup wrote: I cherry-picked those commits now but have no idea what I am actually doing here. During the work on gub it was discoved that lilypond required etex on the build system although it never really used it. Gub pull request 59 (that worked around the probl

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

2019-03-21 Thread David Kastrup
Knut Petersen writes: > On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group.  >> Does that seem the best way forward? > > In rsync-lily-doc.py we have: > >      system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links > --delay-updates --delete

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

2019-03-21 Thread Knut Petersen
On 21.03.19 12:04, Phil Holmes wrote: Anyway - it would seem easiest just to create a 'lilypond' group.  Does that seem the best way forward? In rsync-lily-doc.py we have:      system ('rsync --exclude "*.signature" --hard-links --delay-updates --delete --delete-after --stats --progress -pgo

Re: GSoC in contemporary notations

2019-03-21 Thread Tsz Kiu Pang
Hi Urs, Thank you for your reply, and thank you so much for asking about my name. On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 17:58, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi Tsz Kiu Pang (which of these names would you like to be called, or > should I use all of them like I did?) > Tsz Kiu Pang is fine, though people usually call m

PATCHES - Countdown for March 21st

2019-03-21 Thread James Lowe
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on March 24th. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: 5498 Revert the changes of issue 4914 - David Kastrup https://source

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

2019-03-21 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" [...] >>> I believe GUB upload uses rsync. >> >> Then it depends on the options used. Some versions Oops. Some options >> of rsync try to preserve group/owner. > > It looks like the command is this from upload.py

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

2019-03-21 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:58 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] "Phil Holmes" writes: - Original Message

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

2019-03-21 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:24 AM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] "Phil Holmes" writes: - Original Message

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

2019-03-21 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" > > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:27 PM > Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB > with stable/2.20 branch] > > >> "Phil H

Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch]

2019-03-21 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "John Mandereau" ; "Lily devel" Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:27 PM Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB with stable/2.20 branch] "Phil Holmes" writes: - Original Message