Dan Eble writes:
> On Jul 27, 2018, at 17:21, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>
>> It's not clear to me how the alist per se is a problem and how
>> restructuring could fix that.
>
>
> It’s been a couple months, and I only profiled one regtest, but I
> remember sloppy_assq, string hashing, and string
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:45 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> > The grob-interfaces are a means to group certain functionality (and
>> > respective properties.). Whether it's OK for two separate pieces code to
>> > both use the same property depends on the specific cas
On Jul 27, 2018, at 17:21, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> It's not clear to me how the alist per se is a problem and how
> restructuring could fix that.
It’s been a couple months, and I only profiled one regtest, but I remember
sloppy_assq, string hashing, and string comparison standing out as si
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:45 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > The grob-interfaces are a means to group certain functionality (and
> > respective properties.). Whether it's OK for two separate pieces code to
> > both use the same property depends on the specific case. I suspect this
> > reuse happe
https://codereview.appspot.com/363740043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: thomasmorley651,
https://codereview.appspot.com/363740043/diff/1/lily/prob.cc
File lily/prob.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/363740043/diff/1/lily/prob.cc#newcode36
lily/prob.cc:36: equality; e.g., that two probs are equal iff they can
be
On 2018/07/27 09:32:55, thomasmorl
Can't review C++.
But from a little testing:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Iterating-music-for-voiceOne-Checking-with-equal-td215135.html#a215158
it works as wished.
A question not directly related to your patch:
https://codereview.appspot.com/363740043/diff/1/lily/prob.cc
File lily/pr
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> The grob-interfaces are a means to group certain functionality (and
> respective properties.). Whether it's OK for two separate pieces code to
> both use the same property depends on the specific case. I suspect this
> reuse happens a lot for generic properties such as
The grob-interfaces are a means to group certain functionality (and
respective properties.). Whether it's OK for two separate pieces code to
both use the same property depends on the specific case. I suspect this
reuse happens a lot for generic properties such as #'dir (or was it called
#'directio
Am 24.09.2016 um 11:38 schrieb Frédéric Bron:
Meanwhile, I have compiled make 3.82 and made it available before make
4.0 in the PATH. Then the process goes further up to this point:
$ bin/gub --verbose darwin-x86::cross/gcc
...
building package: linux-x86::cross/gcc
*** Stage: download (cross/
10 matches
Mail list logo
