Re: GUB

On 7/10/2018 4:19 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Is LilyPond the only remaining serious user of GUB? How does Frescobaldi do things? Looks to me like Frescobaldi is using various Python code and something called Inno Setup. From "Freeze

Re: GUB

Knut Petersen writes: > Am 10.07.2018 um 22:08 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen: >> Karlin High writes: >> Who is "we", "everyone", and "we", respectively, in that last sentence? >>> I read it like this: >>> >>> "GUB does have some things that Guix does not have, but if [LilyPond >>> GUB contributo

Re: GUB

Am 10.07.2018 um 22:08 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen: Karlin High writes: Who is "we", "everyone", and "we", respectively, in that last sentence? I read it like this: "GUB does have some things that Guix does not have, but if [LilyPond GUB contributors] add them to Guix, [all Guix users] can enjo

Re: GUB

On 7/10/2018 3:09 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Karlin High writes: Are there any examples of software projects that use Guix to make Windows installers? > No. Or is that one of the things that would need to be added to Guix? Possibly, or that bit could be done outside of Guix. For makin

Re: GUB

Karlin High writes: > Are there any examples of software projects that use Guix to make > Windows installers? Making something functionally equivalent to what > GUB makes for LilyPond? No. Guix does create docker images and relocatable tarballs -- those probably won't help much on Windows. > O

Re: GUB

Karlin High writes: >> Who is "we", "everyone", and "we", respectively, in that last sentence? > > I read it like this: > > "GUB does have some things that Guix does not have, but if [LilyPond > GUB contributors] add them to Guix, [all Guix users] can enjoy and > [the LilyPond community] doesn't h

Re: Spacing_spanner::prune_loose_columns: prune in-place (issue 351720043 by d...@gnu.org)

On 2018/07/10 18:09:19, dak wrote: On 2018/07/10 17:49:33, dak wrote: > On 2018/07/10 17:10:53, benko.pal wrote: > > LGTM; just by looking I can't see how it can make make fail. > > using rp[-2] and rp[-1] instead of lastcol and c would be cleaner to me, but > > YMMV. > > Since the whole point

Re: GUB

On 7/10/2018 1:39 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Guix is very similar. It uses Guile instead of Python and is a whole GNU/Linux system. GUB does have some things that Guix does not have Are there any examples of software projects that use Guix to make Windows installers? Making something funct

Re: GUB

On 7/10/2018 2:01 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: GUB does have some things that Guix does not have, but if we add them to Guix, everyone can enjoy and we don't have to maintain all this ourselves. Who is "we", "everyone", and "we", respectively, in that last sentence? I

Re: GUB

Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Carl Sorensen writes: > >> Wouldn't that mean abandoning Windows? >> >> I haven't looked carefully at GUB for a few years, and even when I >> did, I scarcely advanced beyond the "cargo-cult" stage with it. I'm >> copying Jan on this email, because he can likely gi

Re: GUB

Carl Sorensen writes: > Wouldn't that mean abandoning Windows? > > I haven't looked carefully at GUB for a few years, and even when I > did, I scarcely advanced beyond the "cargo-cult" stage with it. I'm > copying Jan on this email, because he can likely give better answers > than I can. > >

Re: Spacing_spanner::prune_loose_columns: prune in-place (issue 351720043 by d...@gnu.org)

On 2018/07/10 17:49:33, dak wrote: On 2018/07/10 17:10:53, benko.pal wrote: > LGTM; just by looking I can't see how it can make make fail. > using rp[-2] and rp[-1] instead of lastcol and c would be cleaner to me, but > YMMV. Since the whole point is to do the operation in-place, rp[-2] may

Re: Spacing_spanner::prune_loose_columns: prune in-place (issue 351720043 by d...@gnu.org)

Reviewers: Dan Eble, benko.pal, Message: On 2018/07/10 17:10:53, benko.pal wrote: LGTM; just by looking I can't see how it can make make fail. using rp[-2] and rp[-1] instead of lastcol and c would be cleaner to me, but YMMV. Since the whole point is to do the operation in-place, rp[-2] may

Re: Spacing_spanner::prune_loose_columns: prune in-place (issue 351720043 by d...@gnu.org)

LGTM; just by looking I can't see how it can make make fail. using rp[-2] and rp[-1] instead of lastcol and c would be cleaner to me, but YMMV. https://codereview.appspot.com/351720043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lis

Re: GUB

On 7/10/18, 1:30 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: Carl Sorensen writes: > Are there any opinions on whether we should pursue a move to Guix? Wouldn't that mean abandoning Windows? I haven't looked carefully at GUB for a few years, and even when I did, I scarcely advanced bey

PATCHES - Countdown for July10th

Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on 13th July. A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be found here: http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/ Push: 5369 Change highmidtom to himidtom in notation-appendices.itely - Th

Re: GUB

>> guix pack --target=i686-w64-mingw32 guile > > But we'd not longer have regular Windows installers, right? I guess this is correct. Isn't it possible to make the Windows installer simply use the created tarball? [I have no idea how the Windows installer works.] Werner _

Re: GUB

Werner LEMBERG writes: > From: David Kastrup > Subject: Re: GUB > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:30:04 +0200 > >> Carl Sorensen writes: >> >>> In May, when we were discussing the limitations of 32 bit MinGW, I >>> asked Jan for an estimate of how much work it would be to add a 64-bt >>> MinGW to GU

Re: GUB

From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: GUB Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:30:04 +0200 > Carl Sorensen writes: > >> In May, when we were discussing the limitations of 32 bit MinGW, I >> asked Jan for an estimate of how much work it would be to add a 64-bt >> MinGW to GUB. >> >> His answer was that GUB is a

Re: GUB

Hello On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:56:03 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: > Hi Phil! > > > Ubuntu 14 for both. > > Thanks. With a few patches to correct broken download links that worked. > After cleaning up I'll send those patches to you. > > Knut Just to add something related, while Phil uses 14.0 fo

Re: make doc bombs out in MusicXML

Knut, On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:46:06 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: > Am 16.06.2018 um 15:47 schrieb James Lowe: > > Hello > > > > On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:20:43 +0100 (BST), "James Lowe" > > wrote: > > > >> Hello > >> > >> On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:10:10 -0400, Dan Eble wrote: > >> > >>> On Jun 16, 20

Re: GUB

Carl Sorensen writes: > In May, when we were discussing the limitations of 32 bit MinGW, I > asked Jan for an estimate of how much work it would be to add a 64-bt > MinGW to GUB. > > His answer was that GUB is a hack, and that he wasn't interested in > putting any more effort into fixing up GUB,