On 2017/10/22 20:01:03, dak wrote:
On 2017/10/22 19:26:12, benko.pal wrote:
> if it's really the same, can't it be used without copying? or if
separate
> classes are absolutely needed, can't the common part be gathered in
a common
> base class?
You mean, like with Slur/PhrasingSlur? Well
On 2017/10/22 19:26:12, benko.pal wrote:
if it's really the same, can't it be used without copying? or if
separate
classes are absolutely needed, can't the common part be gathered in a
common
base class?
You mean, like with Slur/PhrasingSlur? Well, for one thing, then
someone needs to tak
if it's really the same, can't it be used without copying? or if
separate classes are absolutely needed, can't the common part be
gathered in a common base class?
https://codereview.appspot.com/335910043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
2017-10-22 14:52 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley"
>
> To: "lilypond-devel"
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 9:16 AM
> Subject: obfuscated build-log
>
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just failed to build lilypond, because I forgot to rerun configure,
>> etc after che
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 9:16 AM
Subject: obfuscated build-log
Hi,
I just failed to build lilypond, because I forgot to rerun configure,
etc after checking and building an experimental branch.
While the mistake is
Hi,
I just failed to build lilypond, because I forgot to rerun configure,
etc after checking and building an experimental branch.
While the mistake is obvious, the log obfuscates it by adding a
wagonload of output after the error is stated.
I would have expected to see the error last. Is it possib
