I'm not aware of such an online tool. I've posted a question on
Typedrawers.
http://typedrawers.com/discussion/2292/list-of-opentype-font-feature-inspection-tools
At least for the command line I got the right information! Given that
many people already have TeXLive installed, the `otfinfo' p
On 2017/07/31 17:48:10, lemzwerg wrote:
> If Pango really is agnostic of the features, that is really exciting
and a bit
> mysterious ;-).
Why? It's not Pango but HarfBuzz that processes (i.e., applies) the
OpenType
features to a run of glyphs.
Ah, I see! Thanks for clarifying that. I d
If Pango really is agnostic of the features, that is really exciting
and a bit
mysterious ;-).
Why? It's not Pango but HarfBuzz that processes (i.e., applies) the
OpenType features to a run of glyphs.
Perhaps a note should be added, though, to mention that if the
user requests a feature tha
On 2017/07/31 16:58:40, lemzwerg wrote:
In general, Pango is agnostic of the features themselves, AFAIK. It
simply
forwards the selected stuff to the font in question.
If Pango really is agnostic of the features, that is really exciting and
a bit mysterious ;-).
However, the user has first
This is really great! Do you happen know what the current limitations
are? Or
rather, having the full feature list is great, but if only a few
features are
actually recognized by the underlying typography engine (it's still
Pango,
right?), that would probably be a better list to show, unless
2017-07-31 18:09 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
Hi David,
this refers to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
I opened a new thr
On 2017/07/27 13:47:01, trueroad wrote:
Thank you for your reviewing.
https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode1037
Documentation/ch
David Nalesnik writes:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> this refers to
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
>>> I opened a new thread, because this one will be about rest-markups only.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> this refers to
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
>> I opened a new thread, because this one will be about rest-markups only.
>>
>> rest-by-number-markup and r
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi David,
>
> this refers to
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
> I opened a new thread, because this one will be about rest-markups only.
>
> rest-by-number-markup and rest-markup were impemented by myself
> commit ffa21bb1a55d2436bb4
Hi David,
this refers to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-07/msg00144.html
I opened a new thread, because this one will be about rest-markups only.
rest-by-number-markup and rest-markup were impemented by myself
commit ffa21bb1a55d2436bb432c4dff7ec04df95dc6f0
My second patch
11 matches
Mail list logo
