As of
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5122/#99dc
commit eee677c480c78d58a5215e246575aa94ba2d1897
introduced a regression.
Not sure when I have the time to look deeper into it.
At first sight I've no good idea for a proper fix.
So I suggest to revert it.
At least it should not go
On 06/12/2017 06:24 AM, fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
I like a lot the new color scheme! More elegant and easier for the eyes.
Thanks, glad you like it!
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypo
On 06/12/2017 03:02 PM, Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
CSS is happy with both properties set:
width as a percentage and min-width as an absolute value.
There is no conflict and they should work together well.
Hi, yes, thanks, but... I glossed over the details. If you look at the
css file y
>
> I feel like the table of contents bar at the left is too wide.
>>
>
> I agree; it can get a bit wide especially on wider monitors/windows.
> (Note I have not changed its width in this patch.) Currently the size is a
> percentage of the window width. We could make that smaller, but at the
> ri
On 06/10/2017 07:30 PM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't feel strongly about the old design being bad.
What got me motivated to work on it was the bright (fully saturated)
colored borders around the code blocks, which I found distracting.
The new design looks mostly fine to me.
G
On 2017/06/10 19:36:30, pwm wrote:
That's a nice consistency. I tried it out and the following works
too:
#(define (onpage proc nmbr)
(markup-when ((page:page-number -1))
(proc page:page-number nmbr)))
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a7landscape")
oddFooterMarkup = \markup \on-the
On 2017/06/05 05:01:28, horndude77 wrote:
Update minimum pango version
If I understand correctly, LilyDev 4.1 cannot compile this patch.
In my humble opinion, it is necessary that LilyDev 4.1 can compile it.
I want to hear the opinions of LilyDev 4.1 users.
If it is necessary, shall I create
I like a lot the new color scheme! More elegant and easier for the eyes.
https://codereview.appspot.com/322070043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
https://codereview.appspot.com/321930043/diff/160001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/321930043/diff/160001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode917
Documentation/notation/simultaneous.ite
One nit. See below.
No need for a new patch-set, imho. You could change it right before
pushing.
Otherwise LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/321930043/diff/160001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/
10 matches
Mail list logo
