Re: modify coord-rotate to get exact values for (sin PI) etc (issue 269530043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-10-20 Thread thomasmorley65
On 2015/10/20 22:54:17, thomasmorley651 wrote: no need for code-duplications, increasing readability of cyclic-base-value patch set 2 does some clean up, but not adressing comment #2 https://codereview.appspot.com/269530043/ ___ lilypond-devel maili

Re: modify coord-rotate to get exact values for (sin PI) etc (issue 269530043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-10-20 Thread thomasmorley65
https://codereview.appspot.com/269530043/diff/40001/scm/lily-library.scm File scm/lily-library.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/269530043/diff/40001/scm/lily-library.scm#newcode751 scm/lily-library.scm:751: (cyclic-base-value (+ value cycle) cycle)) what are those red dots?? Never see

Re: modify coord-rotate to get exact values for (sin PI) etc (issue 269530043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-10-20 Thread thomasmorley65
This oe is about radians vs degrees On 2015/10/20 14:25:21, dak wrote: Fundamentally, we cannot fix this properly at the Scheme layer: even in GUILE-2.0, we get scheme@(guile-user)> (sin (atan 0 -1)) $1 = 1.2246467991473532e-16 I think what we should be aiming for is grounding LilyPond's

Re: modify coord-rotate to get exact values for (sin PI) etc (issue 269530043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-10-20 Thread thomasmorley65
Let me split my reply into two. This one about the current patch and how to proceed. On 2015/10/20 14:25:21, dak wrote: I'm not really enthused about this approach even though it originates from a proposal of mine. It works basically by moving around problematic angles, exactly leading t

Re: multiple TextSpanners per voice

2015-10-20 Thread Trevor Bača
This is excellent. The combination of the engraver and the ID labeling work perfectly. I think it would be wonderful to consider including David's engraver in a coming public release. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:28 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, David Kastrup

New Dutch PO file for 'lilypond' (version 2.19.26)

2015-10-20 Thread Translation Project Robot
Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted by the Dutch team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/nl.po (We can arrange things so that

Re: multiple TextSpanners per voice

2015-10-20 Thread David Nalesnik
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Trevor Bača writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to add that I'm *incredibly* excited by this work. The ability > to > > have multiple text spanners in a voice -- and to tweak each independently > > -- is something I've wanted in LilyPond fo

Re: multiple TextSpanners per voice

2015-10-20 Thread David Kastrup
Trevor Bača writes: > Hi, > > I'd like to add that I'm *incredibly* excited by this work. The ability to > have multiple text spanners in a voice -- and to tweak each independently > -- is something I've wanted in LilyPond for many years. (I responded to a > different thread about this a touch to

Re: multiple TextSpanners per voice

2015-10-20 Thread Trevor Bača
Hi, I'd like to add that I'm *incredibly* excited by this work. The ability to have multiple text spanners in a voice -- and to tweak each independently -- is something I've wanted in LilyPond for many years. (I responded to a different thread about this a touch too early only moments ago; apologi

New Dutch PO file for 'lilypond' (version 2.19.26)

2015-10-20 Thread Translation Project Robot
Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted by the Dutch team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/nl.po (We can arrange things so that

Re: modify coord-rotate to get exact values for (sin PI) etc (issue 269530043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)

2015-10-20 Thread dak
I'm not really enthused about this approach even though it originates from a proposal of mine. It works basically by moving around problematic angles, leading to discontinuities at multiples of PI/4 rather than just PI being imprecise. Fundamentally, we cannot fix this properly at the Scheme lay