Re: Migrating the Issues DB from Google Code to Savannah

2015-07-21 Thread David Kastrup
Federico Bruni writes: > Il giorno mer 22 lug 2015 alle 0:22, Trevor Daniels > ha scritto: >> My conclusion is that we can no longer rely on having a working >> Issues DB at SourceForge before the service at Google Code ceases, >> and must therefore aim to transfer the DB directly to our VM at >

Doc; NR - 3.5.9 - added note for articulate.ly (issue 254330043 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2015-07-21 Thread fedelogy
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/254330043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Migrating the Issues DB from Google Code to Savannah

2015-07-21 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno mer 22 lug 2015 alle 0:22, Trevor Daniels ha scritto: My conclusion is that we can no longer rely on having a working Issues DB at SourceForge before the service at Google Code ceases, and must therefore aim to transfer the DB directly to our VM at Savannah. Let's hope that the migr

Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by d...@gnu.org)

2015-07-21 Thread nine . fierce . ballads
On 2015/07/21 19:37:21, dak wrote: So if this patch needs a 1-line change to be ok, no problem with doing that. Or is there? LGTM. No need to lift a finger. I just wanted to register that Keith's comments weren't entirely unappreciated. https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/ _

Migrating the Issues DB from Google Code to Savannah

2015-07-21 Thread Trevor Daniels
Hi A note to update you on progress in migrating our Issues DB away from Google Code. First a reminder that Google Code goes read-only on 24 August 2015, less than 5 weeks away. At that point issue recording and LilyPond development will cease, as least in the current form, unless we have re-

Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by d...@gnu.org)

2015-07-21 Thread dak
On 2015/07/21 18:20:13, Dan Eble wrote: this->f() is sometimes necessary in templates (I recall), but in those cases the compiler warns about ambiguity when it is omitted. I prefer not to see this-> where it is unnecessary, however Keith does have a good point about extra clarity in commen

Re: Remove redundant occurences of this-> (issue 258870043 by d...@gnu.org)

2015-07-21 Thread nine . fierce . ballads
this->f() is sometimes necessary in templates (I recall), but in those cases the compiler warns about ambiguity when it is omitted. I prefer not to see this-> where it is unnecessary, however Keith does have a good point about extra clarity in comments. https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/

Re: Doc: CG - removed information about test-patchy (issue 250570044 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2015-07-21 Thread pkx166h
On 2015/07/21 16:51:21, dak wrote: Well, we certainly would want to have test-patchy work again eventually, using the different server and issue tracker. But then if we do get it to work again, getting the documentation back is just a revert away. Exactly As long as this change stays

Re: Doc: CG - removed information about test-patchy (issue 250570044 by pkx1...@gmail.com)

2015-07-21 Thread dak
Well, we certainly would want to have test-patchy work again eventually, using the different server and issue tracker. But then if we do get it to work again, getting the documentation back is just a revert away. As long as this change stays essentially with one commit and issue. https://codere

Change comments like Voice "1" to Voice = "1" (issue 256860044 by d...@gnu.org)

2015-07-21 Thread lilyfan
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/256860044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel