Dan Eble writes:
> On Jun 30, 2015, at 04:37 , David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> \relative {
>> \partcombine { ... } { ... }
>> }
>>
>> where the ... itself does not have a \relative inside. We might not
>> have something like that in the regtests but I could well imagine that
>> stuff gets erratic
On Jun 30, 2015, at 04:37 , David Kastrup wrote:
>
> \relative {
> \partcombine { ... } { ... }
> }
>
> where the ... itself does not have a \relative inside. We might not
> have something like that in the regtests but I could well imagine that
> stuff gets erratic in that case.
Thank you. T
LGTM. Funny that noone has every tried to simplify this...
https://codereview.appspot.com/252810043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[1][macupdate-logo.png]
top background
App Listing Updated
Hi lilypond.org, We have updated your application listing for LilyPond
2.19.22-1 on [2]MacUpdate.com. Please take a moment to review your
a
Dan Eble writes:
> I don’t see any differences in the regression tests when I remove
> make-non-relative-music from this code. If it’s really necessary, can anyone
> suggest or provide a new regression test that covers it? I’d be happy to see
> it through the review process. Thanks.
>
> (de
On 2015/06/30 01:16:10, Dan Eble wrote:
Neither one seems to be a problem with your change, although adding
"explicit"
anyway shouldn't hurt.
Ok, I checked that neither in assignments nor initializations "ccc" goes
to SCM, and GCC does not even mention considering it: it just says that
it ca
