This blog entry from Behdad regarding Pango, OpenType, and custom
fonts (i.e., fonts provided by applications) might be interesting to
you, since it directly affects lilypond.
http://mces.blogspot.ca/2015/05/how-to-use-custom-application-fonts.html
Werner
___
Reviewers: dak,
Description:
Add ly_is_smob(S) to check if S is a smob of type T.
Hide Smob_base<>::is_smob(S) to prevent the misleading situation of
D::is_smob(S) returning true when S represents an ancestor of D rather
than a D. This issue was previously worked around by overriding
is_smob()
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Cleaned everything out. Baseline got rebuilt, same error. Checking
>> different patch (4360 instead of 4357), same error.
>>
>> I'll eventually do the "reboot computer" dance but I suspect that we got
>> ourselves a problem with Ubuntu 15.04.
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/235790043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> You can basically crack the stuff open anywhere and substitute Scheme
> (and it's going to be fun to do essentially that in order to deflate the
> Scheme engraver implementation and throw the whole map-to-C++ layers
> out).
All of this so
> I suspect that we got ourselves a problem with Ubuntu 15.04.
I got the same assertion, on Lubuntu 15.04.
p
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 01/05/15 11:36, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
On 01/05/15 10:28, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:47 AM
Subject: Strange "make check" error
Never seen anyth
On 01/05/15 11:40, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
Cleaned everything out. Baseline got rebuilt, same error. Checking
different patch (4360 instead of 4357), same error.
I'll eventually do the "reboot computer" dance but I suspect that we got
ourselves a problem with Ubuntu 15.
David Kastrup writes:
> Cleaned everything out. Baseline got rebuilt, same error. Checking
> different patch (4360 instead of 4357), same error.
>
> I'll eventually do the "reboot computer" dance but I suspect that we got
> ourselves a problem with Ubuntu 15.04.
Well, either that, or with the
James writes:
> On 01/05/15 10:28, David Kastrup wrote:
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>>>
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:47 AM
Subject: Strange "make check" error
> Never seen a
On 01/05/15 10:28, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:47 AM
Subject: Strange "make check" error
Never seen anything like that. I suppose it will be a fluke and
rerunning
2015-05-01 11:31 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> In my most recent patch for Issue 4344 I found this line:
>>\override NoteHead.ignore-ambitus = ##t
>> https://codereview.appspot.com/223420043/diff2/20001:40001/ly/engraver-init.ly?context=10&column_width=80
>>
>> I didn'
Thomas Morley writes:
> In my most recent patch for Issue 4344 I found this line:
>\override NoteHead.ignore-ambitus = ##t
> https://codereview.appspot.com/223420043/diff2/20001:40001/ly/engraver-init.ly?context=10&column_width=80
>
> I didn't insert it myself, but I made a rebase against mas
David Kastrup writes:
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "David Kastrup"
>> To:
>> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:47 AM
>> Subject: Strange "make check" error
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Never seen anything like that. I suppose it will be a fluke and
>>> rerunning the test wi
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:47 AM
> Subject: Strange "make check" error
>
>
>>
>> Never seen anything like that. I suppose it will be a fluke and
>> rerunning the test will "fix" it, but has anybody encounte
In my most recent patch for Issue 4344 I found this line:
\override NoteHead.ignore-ambitus = ##t
https://codereview.appspot.com/223420043/diff2/20001:40001/ly/engraver-init.ly?context=10&column_width=80
I didn't insert it myself, but I made a rebase against master before upload.
Is this expec
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:47 AM
Subject: Strange "make check" error
Never seen anything like that. I suppose it will be a fluke and
rerunning the test will "fix" it, but has anybody encountered anything
like that? Strange bugout in
My issue 4357 patchy borked at me again. However, the log file shows
invoking gs -sDEVICE=png16m -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 -dTextAlphaBits=4
-slilypond-datadir=input/regression/out-test/share/lilypond/current -r101
-sOutputFile=/tmp/build-lilypond-autobuild/out/test-results/input/regression/out
On 2015/05/01 01:22:57, Dan Eble wrote:
On 2015/05/01 00:44:45, dak wrote:
> I am not going to put in an explanation for every definition of
equal_p for
some
> smob class.
OK, that makes sense now.
> > invoked as T* t = ly_unsmob(target);
>
> I don't think that warrants a template functio
19 matches
Mail list logo
