Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> linux-64: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64 bit > ligatured pdf is generated. > > linux-x86: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 32 bit (minimal install, no GUI, console only) > non-ligatured pdf is generated. Ah, this is surprising, since up to now exactly the opposite behaviour was reported (this is, working on

Re: Weird issue with dotted-list-notation

2015-03-23 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 23.03.2015 um 17:30 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Ok thanks. If you want to have more of a go at reproducing the problem, >> it's clearly also related to the use of \include, possibly in connection >> with some >> #(ly:parser-[whatever] "\\include ...") >> call. It may be th

Re: Weird issue with dotted-list-notation

2015-03-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.03.2015 um 17:30 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Am 23.03.2015 um 17:18 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Hi David, thank you for taking the time looking into this. Am 23.03.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Well, I do have a minimal examp

Re: Weird issue with dotted-list-notation

2015-03-23 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 23.03.2015 um 17:18 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> thank you for taking the time looking into this. >>> >>> Am 23.03.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: > Well, I do have a minimal example outlining wh

Re: Weird issue with dotted-list-notation

2015-03-23 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.03.2015 um 17:18 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Hi David, thank you for taking the time looking into this. Am 23.03.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Well, I do have a minimal example outlining what I want to do, but "unfortunately" this works exact

Re: Weird issue with dotted-list-notation

2015-03-23 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Hi David, > > thank you for taking the time looking into this. > > Am 23.03.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> Well, I do have a minimal example outlining what I want to do, but >>> "unfortunately" this works exactly as expected: >>> >>> \version

Re: Weird issue with dotted-list-notation

2015-03-23 Thread Urs Liska
Hi David, thank you for taking the time looking into this. Am 23.03.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Well, I do have a minimal example outlining what I want to do, but "unfortunately" this works exactly as expected: \version "2.19.16" testDotList = #(define-void-func

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-23 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
>>> Have you checked ligatures? I think we were able to correlate our >>> ligature problems (don't know the issue right now) to the use of 64bit >>> architecture. It may be related to GhostScript. >> >> I haven't. >> Is it here? >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656 >> >> I'l

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-23 Thread David Kastrup
Masamichi HOSODA writes: >> Have you checked ligatures? I think we were able to correlate our >> ligature problems (don't know the issue right now) to the use of 64bit >> architecture. It may be related to GhostScript. > > I haven't. > Is it here? > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/deta

Re: Weird issue with dotted-list-notation

2015-03-23 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Well, I do have a minimal example outlining what I want to do, but > "unfortunately" this works exactly as expected: > > \version "2.19.16" > > testDotList = > #(define-void-function (parser location opts path) >((ly:context-mod?) list?) >(for-each > (lambda (p)

Re: Ghostscript 9.15

2015-03-23 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> Have you checked ligatures? I think we were able to correlate our > ligature problems (don't know the issue right now) to the use of 64bit > architecture. It may be related to GhostScript. I haven't. Is it here? http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2656 I'll check it. _