Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Dan Eble
On Feb 28, 2015, at 11:34 , David Nalesnik wrote: > "hollow=1" would then be the default for modern notation. minHollowDurationLog would be more descriptive. >>> >>> What an ugly name, but I agree that it is more descriptive than >>> `hollow' and thus probably better. >> >> Should

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Lukas Pietsch
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > > Sorry for repeating myself, but this part of my question may have gone > > unnoticed in the thread above. Could I have some advice on this? Should I be > > defining a new interface for specialized mensural-related grob properties? > > Depends on what is affecte

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread David Kastrup
Lukas Pietsch writes: > Lukas Pietsch freenet.de> writes: > >> Another technical question: I found that apparently if I'm going to declare >> these new grob properties in scm/define-grob-properties.scm, I'll also have >> to declare them as part of some interface somewhere else, otherwise I get >

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Lukas Pietsch
Lukas Pietsch freenet.de> writes: > Another technical question: I found that apparently if I'm going to declare > these new grob properties in scm/define-grob-properties.scm, I'll also have > to declare them as part of some interface somewhere else, otherwise I get > "cannot find interface for pr

Re: Doc: issue 1432 (issue 206770044 by barr...@gmail.com)

2015-02-28 Thread Kevin Barry
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:17 AM, wrote: > Barry if you make a git formatted patch, I can push it for you. > > James > I'm still getting used to git, so I hope I've done it right. It should be attached to this email, assuming that's what you wanted. Kevin From 976465f12cb50c74f5ad4e36121758a759

Re: Patch for issue 3882: stencils with stroke-thickness set to zero (issue 201520044 by luk.piet...@gmail.com)

2015-02-28 Thread pkx166h
Patchy the autobot says: passes tests. Includes a full make doc https://codereview.appspot.com/201520044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread David Nalesnik
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Lukas Pietsch wrote: > Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> writes: > > > >> "hollow=1" would then be the default for modern notation. > > > > > > minHollowDurationLog would be more descriptive. > > > > What an ugly name, but I agree that it is more descriptive than > > `hol

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread David Kastrup
Werner LEMBERG writes: >>> "hollow=1" would then be the default for modern notation. >> >> minHollowDurationLog would be more descriptive. > > What an ugly name, but I agree that it is more descriptive than > `hollow' and thus probably better. I'd put min last. Sorts better, sounds better. ho

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Lukas Pietsch
Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> writes: > >> "hollow=1" would then be the default for modern notation. > > > > minHollowDurationLog would be more descriptive. > > What an ugly name, but I agree that it is more descriptive than > `hollow' and thus probably better. Shouldn't grob properties be spelled w

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> "hollow=1" would then be the default for modern notation. > > minHollowDurationLog would be more descriptive. What an ugly name, but I agree that it is more descriptive than `hollow' and thus probably better. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Dan Eble
On Feb 28, 2015, at 09:55 , Lukas Pietsch wrote: > I'm still not quite sure what you would expect the semantics to be. If we > keep it as a numeric property, but call it "hollow" rather than something > involving "black", we'll first of all have to redefine it: not "duration > beyond which notes

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Ah, ok. On the other hand, having the possibility to say >> >> \override NoteHead.hollow = ##t >> >> to always enforce hollow noteheads makes probably sense, too. > > I'm still not quite sure what you would expect the semantics to be. I'm poking with a stick in the dark :-) In this very cas

Re: [PATCH] support for flagged crotchets in mensural notation

2015-02-28 Thread Lukas Pietsch
Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> writes: > > > >> Well, accepting a bool is not a bad idea. For example, > >> > >> \override NoteHead.hollow = ##f > >> > >> could undo > >> > >> \override NoteHead.hollow = #2 > > > > #f is accepted for all properties anyway. #t isn't by default, however. > > Ah,

Re: Web: be more consistent with use of columns (issue 202080045 by paulwmor...@gmail.com)

2015-02-28 Thread pkx166h
Patch counted down - please push Send me a patch and I can push it for you. James https://codereview.appspot.com/202080045/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

PATCHES: Countdown for March 3rd 2015

2015-02-28 Thread James Lowe
Hello, Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on March 3rd. You can always view the most current countdown list here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch __

Re: Doc: issue 1432 (issue 206770044 by barr...@gmail.com)

2015-02-28 Thread pkx166h
Patch counted down - please push. Barry if you make a git formatted patch, I can push it for you. James https://codereview.appspot.com/206770044/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-d