I have not yet used LilyPond with TeX, so I have no opinion.
I looked up the history:
Use of PostScript glyphshow, rather than show, for all characters seems
to have started with
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=c3d6497157576dc0d4ae77c44978d54e7a212074
after some
> So do I go ahead and continue helping Knut with this patch?
I suggest yes. And thanks in advance for helping :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2015/01/16 18:26:07, J_lowe wrote:
You forgot to set the tracker to patch-new ;)
OK I still got failed to apply to current master when using the
automatic
scripts which should just scrape the download raw file from here.
Manually downloading and applying the raw patch worked and I ran
