Documentation changes are ready for review. I didn't think much needed
to be said.
I also fixed up some inconsistencies in the index terms.
https://codereview.appspot.com/143450043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
September 29th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patc
On 2014/09/24 18:19:43, dak wrote:
On 2014/09/24 17:53:33, fgohier49 wrote:
> On 2014/09/24 14:08:39, dak wrote:
> > On 2014/09/24 13:56:36, fgohier49 wrote:
> > > On 2014/09/24 12:11:12, dak wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Any chance we can get this information from the original patch
author,
or
>
I am interested in lilypad (Windows) development.
Thank you for merging my pull requests.
> I've updated the CG with what I believe are the correct steps for
> developments to LilyPad. The new text is in master, but not yet on the
> website. I'd be interested in comments from anyone with expe
Don Armstrong writes:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Don Armstrong writes:
>> > I'm just trying to keep lilypond in Debian.
>>
>> Yes, that would be very desirable.
>
> So it looks like the guile maintainer is going to be willing to ship
> guile 1.8 if lilypond doesn't support g
https://codereview.appspot.com/143450043/diff/20001/input/regression/time-signature-midmeasure.ly
File input/regression/time-signature-midmeasure.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/143450043/diff/20001/input/regression/time-signature-midmeasure.ly#newcode5
input/regression/time-signature
On 2014/09/25 03:53:35, Dan Eble wrote:
This new patch set works for me. If you approve of it (take your
time), I'll
start working on documentation. Thanks.
Well, your code looks simpler than my sketch: I don't see the \partial
1*0 part implemented. But in my experiments, it does exactly t
