On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:28:14 -0700, wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, is this going to need any extra documentation or
perhaps a changes.tely entry?
https://codereview.appspot.com/133840043/
I read through the documentation and saw no changes except mentioning the
alternative names for bn, etc
On 2014/08/25 10:13:52, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I think you're mistaken. In the original file the unaltered English
notenames
were defined twice, and this patch alters just one of them, leaving
the other
unchanged. So it does just add a variant.
Sorry, I did not expand enough!
https://code
On 2014/08/25 09:17:54, Jean-Charles wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, this patch *changes* every natural pitch in
English instead
of just adding or including a variant for "natural".
Since this will modify what is in place since more than 15 years, it
is
essential to document it, both in "chang
If I'm not mistaken, this patch *changes* every natural pitch in English
instead of just adding or including a variant for "natural".
Since this will modify what is in place since more than 15 years, it is
essential to document it, both in "changes" and over the documentation.
Too bad, I prefer
Excuse my ignorance, is this going to need any extra documentation or
perhaps a changes.tely entry?
https://codereview.appspot.com/133840043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
