On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:40:17 -0700, wrote:
Is it worth making the Notation Reference longer?
What do you suggest?
Depending on your opinion about the NR length, maybe leaving these examples in
lsr only.
https://codereview.appspot.com/110240044/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/pitches.it
This new patch went through a countdown cycle without any
reviews. I'm putting it through another cycle in case
anyone would like to make comments before I push it.
Thanks.
- Mark
https://codereview.appspot.com/103890046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing l
Thanks
https://codereview.appspot.com/108130043/diff/70001/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108130043/diff/70001/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode141
Documentation/changes.tely:141: A new markup command
@code{\justify-line} has
Is it worth making the Notation Reference longer?
What do you suggest?
https://codereview.appspot.com/110240044/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/110240044/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/pitches
2014-06-30 9:41 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
> "Janek Warchoł" :
>> I don't have any better idea. Phil, could you try the attached patch
>> and see if this helps? I don't have GUB set up, and i probably won't
>> have the opportinuty to set it up for myself soon.
>
> Interesting. That appears to have
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> From: "Janek Warchoł"
> To: "David Kastrup"
/home/gub/gub/target/mingw/src/
lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/
lily/include/paper-column.hh:62:
error: expected identifier before ',' token
/home/gub/gub/target/mingw/src/
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ; "LilyPond Development Team"
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: GUB failing
2014-06-29 22:09 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
Phil Holmes writes:
I'm sorry to say that one of Janek's upda
