LGTM, thanks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: lemzwerg, ul_openlilylib.org,
Message:
On 2014/02/10 19:34:46, ul_openlilylib.org wrote:
mailto:lemzw...@googlemail.com schrieb:
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely
>File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right):
>
https://coder
lemzw...@googlemail.com schrieb:
>
>https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely
>File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right):
>
>https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely#newcode32
>Documentation/usage/external.itel
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely
File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely#newcode32
Documentation/usage/external.itely:32: in the @code{PDF} viewer. This
ma
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:31:25 -0800, wrote:
These three examples are more useful as regression tests than as
documentation.
Are they robust enough? Do they exercise each property properly?
They seem good enough, but it is not essential to add them to /input/regressoin/
They won't get lost,
Hello,
On 10 February 2014 02:19, Dan Eble wrote:
> Here is a work-around for
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3834 which I suppose
> suggests both a resolution and a reason not to make a distinction between
> Accidental and AccidentalCautionary in the first place. (I unde
fails make
https://codereview.appspot.com/61540043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61540043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode1083
Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:
Reviewers: ,
Description:
CG: Add hints about using/adding images
This is somewhat sketchy, but I can't afford to make this more thorouh
ATM.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/61540043/
Affected files (+25, -0 lines):
M Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi
M Document
On 2014/02/10 12:50:27, J_lowe wrote:
Thanks Urs.
Some minor points.
https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
Thanks Urs.
Some minor points.
https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2453
Documentation/notation/pitches.i
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This is an addition that David Nalesnik provided upon my request. I
consider this a commonly used accidental style in contemporary music.
Description:
Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat
Add dodecaphonic-no-repeat accidentalStyle
This adds an accidental style th
On 2014/02/10 06:42:20, Keith wrote:
I suggest just removing the obsolete text, and skipping the additions
(unless
you are worried that the manual is getting too short).
:)
Actually I think I had a conversation on similar lines with The Grand
'Foobar' himself (HRH Graham P), when I started.
12 matches
Mail list logo