Re: Doc: Point-and-Click has wrong default value and ref to SVG output needs adding (issue 61630045)

2014-02-10 Thread lemzwerg
LGTM, thanks. https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Doc: Point-and-Click has wrong default value and ref to SVG output needs adding (issue 61630045)

2014-02-10 Thread pkx166h
Reviewers: lemzwerg, ul_openlilylib.org, Message: On 2014/02/10 19:34:46, ul_openlilylib.org wrote: mailto:lemzw...@googlemail.com schrieb: > https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely >File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right): > https://coder

Re: Doc: Point-and-Click has wrong default value and ref to SVG output needs adding (issue 61630045)

2014-02-10 Thread Urs Liska
lemzw...@googlemail.com schrieb: > >https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely >File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right): > >https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely#newcode32 >Documentation/usage/external.itel

Doc: Point-and-Click has wrong default value and ref to SVG output needs adding (issue 61630045)

2014-02-10 Thread lemzwerg
https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely File Documentation/usage/external.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/61630045/diff/1/Documentation/usage/external.itely#newcode32 Documentation/usage/external.itely:32: in the @code{PDF} viewer. This ma

Re: NR: Removed example for alternate repeats (issue 61170044)

2014-02-10 Thread Keith OHara
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:31:25 -0800, wrote: These three examples are more useful as regression tests than as documentation. Are they robust enough? Do they exercise each property properly? They seem good enough, but it is not essential to add them to /input/regressoin/ They won't get lost,

Re: AccidentalCautionary in NullVoice

2014-02-10 Thread James
Hello, On 10 February 2014 02:19, Dan Eble wrote: > Here is a work-around for > https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3834 which I suppose > suggests both a resolution and a reason not to make a distinction between > Accidental and AccidentalCautionary in the first place. (I unde

Re: CG: Add hints about using/adding images (issue 61540043)

2014-02-10 Thread pkx166h
fails make https://codereview.appspot.com/61540043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi File Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/61540043/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi#newcode1083 Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi:

CG: Add hints about using/adding images (issue 61540043)

2014-02-10 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: CG: Add hints about using/adding images This is somewhat sketchy, but I can't afford to make this more thorouh ATM. Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/61540043/ Affected files (+25, -0 lines): M Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi M Document

Re: Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat (issue 61510043)

2014-02-10 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/02/10 12:50:27, J_lowe wrote: Thanks Urs. Some minor points. https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely

Re: Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat (issue 61510043)

2014-02-10 Thread pkx166h
Thanks Urs. Some minor points. https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2453 Documentation/notation/pitches.i

Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat (issue 61510043)

2014-02-10 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: This is an addition that David Nalesnik provided upon my request. I consider this a commonly used accidental style in contemporary music. Description: Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat Add dodecaphonic-no-repeat accidentalStyle This adds an accidental style th

Re: NR: Removed example for alternate repeats (issue 61170044)

2014-02-10 Thread pkx166h
On 2014/02/10 06:42:20, Keith wrote: I suggest just removing the obsolete text, and skipping the additions (unless you are worried that the manual is getting too short). :) Actually I think I had a conversation on similar lines with The Grand 'Foobar' himself (HRH Graham P), when I started.