2013/9/26 :
> LGTM
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/13904043/
Let me add:
I started custom-scheme-coding with LilyPond 2.12.3 and found it
_very_ difficult to modify music-arguments those days, whereas
affecting grobs was quite easy.
Now we have 2.17 and after all your work in this area, modif
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/13904043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi David,
lilypond has a header field "piece", which is meant for movement names.
To have this field centered - default is left above the score - one has
to modify scoreTitleMarkup in paper.
Perhaps other markups would be nice. (a markup is a template by itself,
because it gets its title/copose
I've been wanting a "movement" field in LilyPond's headers. I've managed to
make something for myself that is working, more or less, but I'm sure it could
be done much better by someone who actually knows what he's doing. My idea is
that it should be centered horizontally and be lower on the p
Joseph Rushton Wakeling writes:
>> No doubt about that, but we're not in the situation to fix Windows.
>
> Is the problem Windows, or that many of the GNU dependencies are
> difficult to install on Windows?
The biggest problem as I see it, is illustrated by this very thread.
Talk, talk, talk, com
Keith OHara oco.net> writes:
> Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> > >> > With ragged-bottom set and annotate spacing, on one of my scores
17.19
> > >> > shows 49.07 space left and the next system having an extent of 44.7.
> The next system extent is (-44.70, 4.34) which is a height of 49
