Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread Keith OHara
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > > (1) The positioning of fingerings using the outline of the note-column > > (the last patch under issue 2527) is a user-visible improvement, so it > > would be nice to keep it. I have posted patches to solve two issued > > (3465 and 3363) were caused by the fing

Re: Excludes grobs supported by cross-staff grobs from pure-relevant calculations (issue 12857043)

2013-08-13 Thread mike
https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/side-position-interface.cc File lily/side-position-interface.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/side-position-interface.cc#newcode283 lily/side-position-interface.cc:283: && cross_staff On 2013/08/14 05:34:18,

Re: Excludes grobs supported by cross-staff grobs from pure-relevant calculations (issue 12857043)

2013-08-13 Thread k-ohara5a5a
https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/axis-group-interface.cc#newcode504 lily/axis-group-interface.cc:504: && dynamic_cast (elts[i]))) So if a spanner lies o

Re: LilyPond meeting in Waltrop, Germany, 2013-08-16 to 2013-08-20

2013-08-13 Thread pls
On 12.08.2013, at 19:51, Thomas Morley wrote: > > I'll arrive Thursday, leave Tuesday, sleeping in my tent. This applies to me, too! See you soon! patrick ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li

Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread David Kastrup
Mike Solomon writes: > On 13 août 2013, at 12:41, David Kastrup wrote: > >> We don't need a >> whole reimplementation of old code for the sole purpose of temporarily >> masking bugs with the new implementation by retro-fitting a distant >> clone of the old implementation on top of the unfixed ne

Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread Mike Solomon
On 13 août 2013, at 12:41, David Kastrup wrote: > We don't need a > whole reimplementation of old code for the sole purpose of temporarily > masking bugs with the new implementation by retro-fitting a distant > clone of the old implementation on top of the unfixed new > implementation. I put up

Re: Finale: why is this not automatic?

2013-08-13 Thread Janek Warchoł
Yeah... funny that we have the same problem (see attachment) 2013/8/12 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > FYI, > > We're not amazing with dynamics alignment, but apparently we're not > the only one > > https://twitter.com/jonsenge/status/367018161549234176 > > Jan > > -- > Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond

Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread David Kastrup
Mike Solomon writes: > On 13 août 2013, at 11:59, David Kastrup wrote: > >> It's window dressing on bugs if the design does actually work properly, > > That's exactly what this is, but it allows us to isolate the bug and > put a big TODO. I don't see that it allows us "to isolate the bug" and i

Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread Mike Solomon
On 13 août 2013, at 11:59, David Kastrup wrote: > Mike Solomon writes: > >> The short term solution may be to create an internal property called >> "pure-relevant", set it to #t as default for all grobs in the >> Grob::Grob constructor and set to false only when necessary in >> define-grobs.cc

Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread David Kastrup
Mike Solomon writes: > The short term solution may be to create an internal property called > "pure-relevant", set it to #t as default for all grobs in the > Grob::Grob constructor and set to false only when necessary in > define-grobs.cc. Then, write a big fat comment saying that the goal > eve

Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread David Kastrup
"Keith OHara" writes: > When solving regressions we have the choice to go forward or to retreat -- > to repair, or revert, the change that caused the regression. > > (1) The positioning of fingerings using the outline of the note-column > (the last patch under issue 2527) is a user-visible improv

Re: wrt 'Make doc crashing on my PC'

2013-08-13 Thread David Kastrup
Petr Gajdos writes: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Petr Gajdos wrote: >> Reply to 'Make doc crashing on my PC' thread started on 22 Jun 2013. >> >> Hi list, >> >> I have same symptomps like Phil described. >> >> Snippet of build log: >> -8<-

Re: untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread Mike Solomon
On 13 août 2013, at 11:33, "Keith OHara" wrote: > When solving regressions we have the choice to go forward or to retreat -- > to repair, or revert, the change that caused the regression. > > (1) The positioning of fingerings using the outline of the note-column (the > last patch under issue 25

untangling the remaining regressions

2013-08-13 Thread Keith OHara
When solving regressions we have the choice to go forward or to retreat -- to repair, or revert, the change that caused the regression. (1) The positioning of fingerings using the outline of the note-column (the last patch under issue 2527) is a user-visible improvement, so it would be nice to

Re: wrt 'Make doc crashing on my PC'

2013-08-13 Thread Petr Gajdos
Hello, On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Petr Gajdos wrote: > Reply to 'Make doc crashing on my PC' thread started on 22 Jun 2013. > > Hi list, > > I have same symptomps like Phil described. > > Snippet of build log: > -8<-- > /home/abuild/rp