Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> I don't think that distributing ( and ) between standalone event and
>> post-event respectively is a concept that will carry the day
>> sufficiently to be given a chance at a comeback. It would make
>
On 2013/08/06 10:30:44, dak wrote:
I can't really work with "the comments are confusing"
Sorry, I meant the commit message and texidoc.
I don't really see
that the characterization of the commit messages is accurate.
It was the "make special characters 'non-special'" that confused me.
The f
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I don't think that distributing ( and ) between standalone event and
> post-event respectively is a concept that will carry the day
> sufficiently to be given a chance at a comeback. It would make
> (c (d) e)
> visually co
I can't really work with "the comments are confusing" and I don't really
see that the characterization of the commit messages is accurate. I can
try to reword them in a manner that puts less stress on the state before
the change.
https://codereview.appspot.com/12432043/diff/6001/input/regressio
