On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> I'm a LyricText and I've caught the Stem of my parent NoteHead
> relative coordinate from stem to me is: 1.251178
> relative coordinate from me to stem is: 0.00
>
> Is this intentional?
> If so, why?
> I expected that the second number w
On 2013/03/12 22:12:34, janek wrote:
As usual, i have a dumb question about the commit message.
What is the relation of \xxx to #xxx and $xxx?
I can't quite grok the commit message :/
Uh, \xxx is something starting with a backslash, $xxx is something
starting with a dollar sign, #xxx is somethi
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:46:26AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> And if the patch is not too intrusive. Please note that I have
> a number of updates in my GUB tree and I also noticed that
> the Denemo guys have a fork.
>
> Applying gratituous whitespace patches breaks including patches
> fro
Graham Percival writes:
>> So now I need to patch the gcc sources because they have a small bug
>> that prevents building, and here I am puzzled about the overall GUB
>> architecture. Why is the patching logic spread out between actual
>> patch files and Python spec files?
That's somewhat arbitra
Reviewers: MikeSol, joeneeman, lemzwerg,
Message:
Please review.
You'll find an illustration in the issue tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3239#c2
Description:
reorganize self_alignment_interface - part 1
Currently self_alignment_interface is quite messy. We have man
hi all,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:15 AM, wrote:
> The image Trevor Bača posted
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/pngIGBdggySyh.png
> shows that the left ends of a decrecsendo-hairpin are vertical aligned
> even if the hairpin isn't extended horizontal but ascending.
> Cur
On 11 March 2013 01:23, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (snip)
>
> What i would like: specify the reference grob in a property, for example
>
> \override LyricText #'align-to = #'Stem
Hi,
I'm not a developer, so my question might be stupid, but
Can't you use existing "break-alignable-interface",
Nice hairpins!
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly
File input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/23001/input/regression/ferneyhough-hairpins.ly#newcode4
input/regression/ferneyhoug
i don't feel competent enough to say LGTM, but i certainly didn't notice
anything wrong.
best
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/7755043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi Mike,
i've read changes in code and i don't quite get what this change is for.
What makes it possible that we can now accept boxes that are narrower
than epsilon? What can we achieve with that and why?
I'm sorry for asking such boring questions, but this is one of your
smallest patches and
LGTM.
I think it would be clearer if the descrption focused more on this
change, and a bit less on explaining context of \relative discussions.
In other words, the sentence "This is intended as a potential migration
strategy to issue 3229 where
leaving off the optional reference pitch leads to a
LGTM
Janek
PS i dedicate all my code reviews to Graham Percival. +1 for Graham!
https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
As usual, i have a dumb question about the commit message.
What is the relation of \xxx to #xxx and $xxx?
I can't quite grok the commit message :/
https://codereview.appspot.com/7501046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://li
Hi,
i began rewriting self_alignment code; first part is here - please
review: http://codereview.appspot.com/7768043
To move forward i have to understand a few things: strange behaviour
of relative_coordinate
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-03/msg00131.html
and DynamicText al
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2013/3/12 Julien Rioux :
>> On 02/03/2013 11:54 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello. When trying to build lilypond, I had to install the
>>> texlive-metapost package which the autogen.sh did not ask for. Is this
>>> a flaw of the config
2013/3/12 Julien Rioux :
> On 02/03/2013 11:54 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>>
>> Hello. When trying to build lilypond, I had to install the
>> texlive-metapost package which the autogen.sh did not ask for. Is this
>> a flaw of the config process?
>>
>
> Actually, ./configure is checking for both mf a
On 02/03/2013 11:54 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello. When trying to build lilypond, I had to install the
texlive-metapost package which the autogen.sh did not ask for. Is this
a flaw of the config process?
Actually, ./configure is checking for both mf and mpost. Do you still
have a config.log
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:37:30PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Colin Hall writes:
>>
>> > Absolutely. I thought that we had adopted this proposal:
>> >
>> > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_3.html
>>
>> So what?
>>
>> The policy is: David Kastrup has sole a
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:10:38AM -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> For Octave, I'm trying to update GUB to use a newer gcc, and I'm
> running across a few problems.
>
> I haven't done much, but here is my clone of the repo:
>
> http://hg.octave.org/gub
>
> So now I need to patch the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:37:30PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Colin Hall writes:
>
> > Absolutely. I thought that we had adopted this proposal:
> >
> > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_3.html
>
> So what?
>
> The policy is: David Kastrup has sole authority over what goes into
> st
20 matches
Mail list logo
