On 12 févr. 2013, at 07:21, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
> consider this real-life example (omitting the unimportant voices).
>
> <<
>\new Staff = "R" \relative c' {
> \voiceTwo
> d16[ b
>\change Staff = "L" \stemUp
>g
>\change Staff = "R" \stem
Folks,
consider this real-life example (omitting the unimportant voices).
<<
\new Staff = "R" \relative c' {
\voiceTwo
d16[ b
\change Staff = "L" \stemUp
g
\change Staff = "R" \stemDown
b d b]
}
\new Staff = "L" \relative c' {
\c
> i hope to get back to lilypond hacking now.
Aah! Great!
> Any particular thing that i should know about?
Please comment
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3155
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 12 févr. 2013, at 02:58, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
>> Should get you started OK:
>
> Thanks for this!
>
> First, I'm going to turn this into a music function so I don't have to keep
> typing it all.
> Then I'm going to see if I can turn it into a callback function for
> Metron
Hi Mike,
> Should get you started OK:
Thanks for this!
First, I'm going to turn this into a music function so I don't have to keep
typing it all.
Then I'm going to see if I can turn it into a callback function for
MetronomeMark — that's where I mostly need it.
Many thanks,
Kieren.
___
Janek Warchoł writes:
> Hi all,
>
> i hope to get back to lilypond hacking now. I miss it a lot...
I know how that feels, looking at my backlog. Unfortunately I have a
day job which is, uh, LilyPond hacking, and it is leaving me with not
enough time to do LilyPond hacking.
> Quite frankly, i
On 2013/02/11 20:53:53, Keith wrote:
On 2013/02/11 12:39:02, dak wrote:
> On 2013/02/11 09:25:20, dak wrote:
> > On 2013/02/11 06:18:57, Keith wrote:
> > >
> > > I was hoping to be able to provide a backward-compatibility
function, as
in
> > I did not even look at the proposed patch but it t
2013/2/12 Janek Warchoł :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i hope to get back to lilypond hacking now. I miss it a lot...
>
Welcome back, Janek!
--David
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2013/2/12 Janek Warchoł :
> Hi all,
>
> i hope to get back to lilypond hacking now. I miss it a lot...
Great to see you back!!
-Harm
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi all,
i hope to get back to lilypond hacking now. I miss it a lot...
Quite frankly, i have to say that you are awesome people :)
Any particular thing that i should know about? I don't see any
"developer summaries" to inform myself, unfortunately, so feel free to
post links to tracker issues a
James wrote
> I can do this. Although I thought that someone had already voluntered.
> Eluze? (I cannot remember)
>
> Anyway, assuming that no one else offers, I'll take a look and make a
> start
> of it on Wednesday.
I not really volunteered, but agreed to have a look at it - but I would
really
Hello,
On 11 February 2013 14:42, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hi, the duties of the Patch meister are outlined in
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling>.
> Currently, nobody is doing this job since Colin Campbell took a
> sabbatical in order to find some time for
On 2013/02/11 12:39:02, dak wrote:
On 2013/02/11 09:25:20, dak wrote:
> On 2013/02/11 06:18:57, Keith wrote:
> >
> > I was hoping to be able to provide a backward-compatibility
function, as in
> I did not even look at the proposed patch but it touches several
binaries.
That
> should not be n
2013/2/10 :
> Updates:
> Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
>
> Comment #15 on issue 3104 by d...@gnu.org: note-by-number and note don't
> support flag styles other than default
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3104
>
> Countdown complete (actually already yesterday).
On 2013/02/11 17:01:17, mike7 wrote:
On 11 févr. 2013, at 16:29, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
> scm/output-lib.scm:61: (define-public pure-safe-stencil-height
> Perhaps add any information about the name? Its name claims to
produce
> a pure value, but it actually outputs callbacks both for pu
On 11 févr. 2013, at 16:29, d...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm
> File scm/define-grobs.scm (right):
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode2570
> scm/define-grobs.scm:2570: (Y-extent . ,pure-safe-sten
https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm
File scm/define-grobs.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode2570
scm/define-grobs.scm:2570: (Y-extent . ,pure-safe-stencil-height)
Are there grobs that don't have this definition o
Hi, the duties of the Patch meister are outlined in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling>.
Currently, nobody is doing this job since Colin Campbell took a
sabbatical in order to find some time for doing things with LilyPond
rather than for LilyPond and thus rechar
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
A number of the links on the Development pages for the various languages
point to pages that don't exist (e.g. the Czech page
http://lilypond.org/development.cs.html) or don't point to translated
pages when they do exist (e.g. http://lilypond.org
On 2013/02/11 09:25:20, dak wrote:
On 2013/02/11 06:18:57, Keith wrote:
> On 2013/02/09 08:54:03, dak wrote:
>
> > It doesn't matter. LilyPond is still being actively maintained.
If a
> > feature is required, it can be implemented properly, with a proper
> > interface, _without_ resorting to e
On 2013/02/11 06:18:57, Keith wrote:
On 2013/02/09 08:54:03, dak wrote:
> It doesn't matter. LilyPond is still being actively maintained. If
a
> feature is required, it can be implemented properly, with a proper
> interface, _without_ resorting to exploits.
>
I was hoping to be able to
Reviewers: Keith,
Message:
On 2013/02/10 20:42:35, Keith wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7303067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely
File Documentation/notation/editorial.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7303067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely#newco
22 matches
Mail list logo
