On 11 févr. 2013, at 06:41, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/4515158/diff/2009/lily/align-interface.cc
> File lily/align-interface.cc (right):
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/4515158/diff/2009/lily/align-interface.cc#newcode222
> lily/align-interface.cc:222: dy =
On 2013/02/09 08:54:03, dak wrote:
It doesn't matter. LilyPond is still being actively maintained. If a
feature is required, it can be implemented properly, with a proper
interface, _without_ resorting to exploits.
I was hoping to be able to provide a backward-compatibility function, as
in
https://codereview.appspot.com/4515158/diff/2009/lily/align-interface.cc
File lily/align-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/4515158/diff/2009/lily/align-interface.cc#newcode222
lily/align-interface.cc:222: dy = max (dy, min_distance);
On 2013/02/11 05:01:28, MikeSol wrote:
Co
https://codereview.appspot.com/4515158/diff/2009/lily/align-interface.cc
File lily/align-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/4515158/diff/2009/lily/align-interface.cc#newcode222
lily/align-interface.cc:222: dy = max (dy, min_distance);
On 2011/06/09 02:55:55, Keith wrote:
On 20
https://codereview.appspot.com/7303067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely
File Documentation/notation/editorial.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7303067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/editorial.itely#newcode157
Documentation/notation/editorial.itely:157: Markup texts or st
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:24:41 -0800, wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7310075/diff/10/lily/grob.cc#newcode488
lily/grob.cc:488: Interval iv = robust_scm2interval (iv_scm, Interval
());
On 2013/02/10 03:08:04, Keith wrote:
I assume you will apply this change and the change in
separation-it
On 10 févr. 2013, at 20:45, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> Doesn't this have the same problem as my attempted patch for issue 1669
> ?
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/7304068/
>
> ___
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> https://l
Doesn't this have the same problem as my attempted patch for issue 1669
?
https://codereview.appspot.com/7304068/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2013/02/10 16:51:30, PhilEHolmes wrote:
The Czech strings resemble what I deduced from reading what is in
Documentation/cs
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7307088/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/ma
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Please review.
Description:
This patch adds many Czech translations as I can manage, and gets rid of
a lot of warnings in make website and make doc. Also deletes some old
2.12 code.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/7307088/
Affected files:
M scripts
- Original Message -
From: "Felix Janda"
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 1:59 PM
Subject: Remove version 2.12 specific parts from create-weblinks-itexi.py
Hi,
when grepping for things which look like version numbers I noticed some
version 2.12 specific code in scripts/build/crea
Hi,
when grepping for things which look like version numbers I noticed some
version 2.12 specific code in scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.py.
The attached patch removes code which won't be executed in lilypond
versions other than 2.12.
Felix
diff --git a/scripts/build/create-weblinks-itexi.p
12 matches
Mail list logo
