As previously, there are no comments whatsoever putting the code into
perspective. This is an amorphous heap of code without an attempt of
explaining its design or inner logic. There is a single function
comment giving a glimpse of what that function is supposed to do.
However, there is no expla
Marc Hohl writes:
> [code.google.com doesn't let me use the html form to reply, I claims
> out that
> thomasmorle...@googlemail.com is an invalid owner username. Huh?]
Delete the @googlemail.com and continue. Maybe people with an
@googlemail.com address need to change this to @gmail.com in thei
[code.google.com doesn't let me use the html form to reply, I claims out
that
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com is an invalid owner username. Huh?]
Am 01.02.2013 09:20, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Comment #2 on issue 3150 by d...@gnu.org: oversight in repeats.itely
with old bar-line-glyphs
