Re: Doc: extend description of glissandi (2844) (issue 6567059)

Reviewers: benko.pal, Message: On 2012/09/28 07:52:32, benko.pal wrote: what about an example like \afterGrace f1\glissando f'16 ? Done - thanks! Description: Doc: extend description of glissandi (2844) Add examples of - connecting notes across staves - connecting notes in chords

Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052)

Looks good so far. In one pdf previewer (evince) at low resolution, the span bars look a little thicker than the regular bar lines. Maybe a rounding fault of the viewer, but it would be better if you know how to avoid it. http://codereview.appspot.com/6498052/diff/24001/scm/bar-line.scm File s

Re: Patch-testing-problem

Thomas Morley googlemail.com> writes: > I wanted to test Marc's bar-line-patch somewhat closer, but I have a > problem, not knowing what to do. > > git apply --index 0001-bar-line.patch > > error: patch failed: > Documentation/snippets/adding-orchestral-cues-to-a-vocal-score.ly:4 > error: Docu

Re: Patch-testing-problem

2012/9/28 James : > Hello, > > On 28 September 2012 21:24, Thomas Morley > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wanted to test Marc's bar-line-patch somewhat closer, but I have a >> problem, not knowing what to do. >> >> I did (because I don't know what went wrong I post every detail): >> >> 1. Downloaded the p

Re: Doc: improve documentation of Bézier curves (2858) (issue 6561064)

Trevor-- Thank you so much for taking this on! I've been pecking at documenting this for awhile, but got hung up on finding the perfect examples... What you have is clearer than what I cam up with. https://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely Fil

Re: Patch-testing-problem

Hello, On 28 September 2012 21:24, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to test Marc's bar-line-patch somewhat closer, but I have a > problem, not knowing what to do. > > I did (because I don't know what went wrong I post every detail): > > 1. Downloaded the patch from Rietveld and stored it i

Patch-testing-problem

Hi, I wanted to test Marc's bar-line-patch somewhat closer, but I have a problem, not knowing what to do. I did (because I don't know what went wrong I post every detail): 1. Downloaded the patch from Rietveld and stored it in `0001-bar-line.patch' 2. To get the newest lily-source-code (I'm usi

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/6568055/diff/7001/mf/feta-scripts.mf File mf/feta-scripts.mf (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6568055/diff/7001/mf/feta-scripts.mf#newcode1781 mf/feta-scripts.mf:1781: penlabels (1,2,3,4); z4 is not defined with penpos4, so you should use `labels' inste

Re: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048)

> The only drawback is that one might want \yes/\no as a pairing for some > different purpose. \no is really a rather important word. I don't think that this is a problem, at least I've never seen someone using \no. It's exactly the same amount to type as ##f. Werner

Syntax clarification/change/improvement for -d[value]

I guess this is part of what GLISS is, currently issue 2139 wants to clarify some usage options ELuze pointed out that: --- when reading the line -d,--define-default=var=val it is not intuitively clear where to use equal signs - does the 1st equal sign need to be written when writing -d o

Re: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048)

On 2012/09/28 15:06:38, janek wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:30 AM, wrote: > I must be in a controversial mood today since I feel like upholding the > idea. I had been thinking about it while fetching breakfast and eating > and was about to reenter discussion when I

Re: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048)

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:30 AM, wrote: > I must be in a controversial mood today since I feel like upholding the > idea. I had been thinking about it while fetching breakfast and eating > and was about to reenter discussion when I found that I had already > convinced you, so this is a bit awkwa

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

- Original Message - From: "James" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: ; ; ; ; Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:38 PM Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055) On 28 September 2012 15:12, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł" To: "Phil Holmes"

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

Janek Warchoł writes: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: >> >>> Does this convince you? >> >> No - sorry. I can't envisage any situation where anyone would want to align >> to the inside bend of a tick mark. > > I suppose that someone might want to use this glyph as something

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> Does this convince you? > > No - sorry. I can't envisage any situation where anyone would want to align > to the inside bend of a tick mark. I suppose that someone might want to use this glyph as something else than breathing mark, so i pr

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

"Phil Holmes" writes: > I'm always a little nervous about simply deleting staging, although I > know this is the correct approach. David - could you give me the > commands needed to delete and recreate staging, please? (Private mail > if you don't want everyone to try this out). Everyone does

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

On 28 September 2012 15:12, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł" > > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: ; ; > ; ; ; > > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:09 PM > Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055) > > > >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Phil Holme

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

- Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: ; ; ; ; ; Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:09 PM Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055) On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: This is clear, but I've had a think about this and I d

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: > This is clear, but I've had a think about this and I don't agree. The > natural reference point of the tick is its bottom, not the middle of the > tick, which is a somewhat arbitrary point based on the aesthetics of the > line widths chosen -

Re: Patchy email from PhilH

- Original Message - From: To: Cc: Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 2:44 PM Subject: Patchy email from PhilH Begin LilyPond compile, commit: cd09a4e7f2655f3bec65979a604d8f9f9bf454da Merged staging, now at: 0d09cf7fd29ae8f746b58f4c6c3b97abee8ce8f7 Success: ./autogen.sh --noconfigur

Patchy email from PhilH

Begin LilyPond compile, commit: cd09a4e7f2655f3bec65979a604d8f9f9bf454da Merged staging, now at: 0d09cf7fd29ae8f746b58f4c6c3b97abee8ce8f7 Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure Success:../configure --disable-optimising Success:

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

Updated glyph. Please review. http://codereview.appspot.com/6568055/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation errorwith page-breaking-page-count3.ly]

- Original Message - From: "Marc Hohl" To: Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:00 AM Subject: Re: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation errorwith page-breaking-page-count3.ly] Am 28.09.2012 11:38, schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: Well, it seems to b

Re: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation error with page-breaking-page-count3.ly]

Am 28.09.2012 11:38, schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: Well, it seems to be not as simple as that. I did a 'make test' on my patch. This fails, obviously. The console says: Dissecting... Writing snippets... Processing... Processing /home/marc/git/lilypond/out/lybook-testdb/snippet-nam

Re: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation errorwith page-breaking-page-count3.ly]

Am 28.09.2012 11:45, schrieb Phil Holmes: - Original Message - From: "Marc Hohl" To: Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:30 AM Subject: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation errorwith page-breaking-page-count3.ly] I did a 'make test' on my patch. This fails, ob

Re: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation errorwith page-breaking-page-count3.ly]

- Original Message - From: "Marc Hohl" To: Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:30 AM Subject: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation errorwith page-breaking-page-count3.ly] I did a 'make test' on my patch. This fails, obviously. The console says: [snip] Did

Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)

- Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: ; ; ; ; ; Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:02 PM Subject: Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055) I would also place the vertical "center" of the box level with "top dip point", ie the point labeled 2r in

Re: Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation error with page-breaking-page-count3.ly]

Marc Hohl writes: > Well, it seems to be not as simple as that. > > I did a 'make test' on my patch. This fails, obviously. > The console says: > > Dissecting... > Writing snippets... > Processing... > Processing > /home/marc/git/lilypond/out/lybook-testdb/snippet-names-3552501373601762147.ly >

Error tracking through the log files [was: Re: Compilation error with page-breaking-page-count3.ly]

Am 28.09.2012 10:16, schrieb Marc Hohl: Am 28.09.2012 01:38, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com: Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work Comment #33 on issue 2790 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Patch: bar-line interface part 2/2 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2790 Patchy say

Re: Compilation error with page-breaking-page-count3.ly

- Original Message - From: "Marc Hohl" To: Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 9:16 AM Subject: Compilation error with page-breaking-page-count3.ly Am 28.09.2012 01:38, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com: Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work Comment #33 on issue 2790 by pkx1.

Re: [talk] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y"

Changing to [talk] tag as the discussion is more at a "floating ideas" level now. Graham Percival writes: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 03:44:27PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> Reinhold Kainhofer writes: >> >> >>> { >> >>> \at 4 \< >> >>> \at 1*2/3 \! >> >>> c'1\p >> >>> } >> >> [12 days l

Compilation error with page-breaking-page-count3.ly

Am 28.09.2012 01:38, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com: Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work Comment #33 on issue 2790 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Patch: bar-line interface part 2/2 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2790 Patchy says 'fail on make check' - took an age to f

Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052)

Am 28.09.2012 00:54, schrieb thomasmorle...@googlemail.com: One tiny addition: http://codereview.appspot.com/6498052/diff/24001/scm/bar-line.scm File scm/bar-line.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6498052/diff/24001/scm/bar-line.scm#newcode1053 scm/bar-line.scm:1053: (define-bar-

Re: bar-line interface part 2/2: New bar line definition standard (issue 6498052)

Am 28.09.2012 00:21, schrieb ianhuli...@gmail.com: Apart from a typo in changes.tely (q.v.), LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/6498052/diff/24001/Documentation/changes.tely File Documentation/changes.tely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6498052/diff/24001/Documentation/changes.tely

Re: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048)

Am 28.09.2012 09:30, schrieb d...@gnu.org: [...] And things like \once\no Clef also work reasonably well. The proposed "\single" is more awkward, but "\single\omit Clef" is not that much better, so maybe "\single" should change. I don't feel quite happy with \single either; just a spontaneous

Doc: extend description of glissandi (2844) (issue 6567059)

what about an example like \afterGrace f1\glissando f'16 ? http://codereview.appspot.com/6567059/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Caches grob properties before evaluation. (issue 6573066)

Reviewers: , Message: This slows down LilyPond - I haven't done comprehensive tests of how much. I'm pretty sure it works (the regtest works as expected). Irrespective of how multiple passes are done, this seems like a necessary first step. Note that this patch would not have a time impact if i

Re: Uses horizontal skylines in accidental placement (issue 6489086)

accidental spacing comparison posted as comment 4 in issue 2141 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2141#c4 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:56 AM, wrote: > Both Mike and Janek thought the accidentals needed a bit more padding > for close intervals, so I think Janek should try horizon_pa

Re: Provide \hide and \omit functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048)

On 2012/09/28 06:26:03, janek wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:33 AM, wrote: >> what about using \no for turning stencil off? e.g. >> \new Voice \with { \no StringNumber } > > It is grammatically cuter in connection with \with, but that's actually > more a problem of \wit

Re: [GLISS] non-timed or non-musical events "z" "y"

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 03:44:27PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > > >>> { > >>> \at 4 \< > >>> \at 1*2/3 \! > >>> c'1\p > >>> } > >> [12 days later, and no followup again] > >> > >> Let's just continue pretending me to be a naysayer then. > > > > You demonstrated