Re: Doc: mention empty chords; avoid using zero-duration spacers in examples (issue 6197068)

Absorbed suggestions. Added snippets. http://codereview.appspot.com/6197068/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6197068/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode749

Re: Doc build hanging (with memory leak?)

On 14/05/12 07:35, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:38:54AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: Here you go. :-) Let me know if it needs tweaking or might be better in another section of the guide. Please see the "summary for experienced developers" in the CG. That really

Re: Plan for discussions

On 14 mai 2012, at 08:04, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> One idea I've been a fan of for a long time is some type of aux file >> system in LilyPond. That is, if we can come up with a file format >> that stores loads of data from previous runs of a score and then can

Re: Plan for discussions

"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > One idea I've been a fan of for a long time is some type of aux file > system in LilyPond. That is, if we can come up with a file format > that stores loads of data from previous runs of a score and then can > somehow compare it to a parsed file, it could cut co

Re: Plan for discussions

Graham Percival writes: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: >> On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote: >> >LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this >> >question can be split into two separate ones: >> >- what capabilities should a

Re: Plan for discussions

On 14 mai 2012, at 07:37, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: >> On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote: >>> LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this >>> question can be split into two separate ones: >>> - wh

Re: Plan for discussions

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:51:45AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote: > >LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this > >question can be split into two separate ones: > >- what capabilities should alternate programs (i.e. frescoba

Re: Doc build hanging (with memory leak?)

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:38:54AM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > Here you go. :-) Let me know if it needs tweaking or might be > better in another section of the guide. Please see the "summary for experienced developers" in the CG. - Graham

Re: LoMus 2012

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:17 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *Thierry Coduys > *Subject: **LoMus 2012* > *Date: *12 mai 2012 12:15:03 HAEC > *To: *m...@mikesolomon.org > > Dear Mike, > > The jury wishes to congratulate you on your LilyPond open source softwar

PATCH: Countdown to 20120515

For 20:00 MDT Tuesday May 15 Critical: Issue 2505 : Patch: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript - R 6137050 Issue 2532

Re: Plan for discussions

On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote: LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler". So this question can be split into two separate ones: - what capabilities should alternate programs (i.e. frescobaldi) have? - what should the input syntax be? When considering these question

Re: Doc build hanging (with memory leak?)

On 12/05/12 17:22, James wrote: On 12 May 2012 14:24, Joseph Rushton Wakeling A small word to this effect might be a nice addition to the contributor guide (I'll make a patch if you like). Sure go ahead. Here you go. :-) Let me know if it needs tweaking or might be better in another sectio

Re: Plan for discussions

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: > I think it's about the big picture stuff and general design. At the > moment, i don't see any vision that we - The LilyPond Development Team > - have about how the future of the project should look like, oh, I definitely have a visi

Re: commit access

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:28:47PM +0200, Benkő Pál wrote: > dear team and Project Manager, > > I'd like to get commit access. Make an account at savannah, and send a request via the savannah project page. I'll act on it within 48 hours (wifi connection at this hotel isn't the greatest). - Grah

line_count fixes (issue 6211047)

Reviewers: , http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/slur-scoring.cc File lily/slur-scoring.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6211047/diff/1/lily/slur-scoring.cc#newcode593 lily/slur-scoring.cc:593: && Staff_symbol_referencer::on_staff_line (on_staff, (int) rint (pos))) this c

Re: Doc: mention empty chords; avoid using zero-duration spacers in examples (issue 6197068)

http://codereview.appspot.com/6197068/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6197068/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode749 Documentation/notation/changing-defaults

Re: Server at Paris VIII

- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: Agreed. I think the most we'd use it for would be LSR. I don't think we should give ssh logins to developers for testing patches; that should be done locally otherwise it could easily lead to major headaches [3] for whoever's handling

Adds Flag to Fingering side support list (issue 6201079)

http://codereview.appspot.com/6201079/diff/1/input/regression/fingering-flag.ly File input/regression/fingering-flag.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6201079/diff/1/input/regression/fingering-flag.ly#newcode4 input/regression/fingering-flag.ly:4: texidoc = "Horizontal fingerings avoid f

Re: Server at Paris VIII

Graham Percival writes: > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:08:58PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> John suggests that we set up a basic infrastructure that allows >> us to access the server via SSH and then do with it as we wish. >> Note that I am using the words "SSH" to a lesser extent "server

Re: Server at Paris VIII

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:08:58PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > John suggests that we set up a basic infrastructure that allows > us to access the server via SSH and then do with it as we wish. > Note that I am using the words "SSH" to a lesser extent "server" > without really knowing what

Re: Lilipond's web site update suggestion (Frescobaldi compatible platforms)

Graham, James, Thank you for considering this simple request so fast! Marc Le 12/05/2012 18:15, James a écrit : Hello, On 12 May 2012 16:41, Graham Percival wrote: Hi Marc, Thanks for the report! James: could you either make this change yourself (after double-checking the details), or add

Re: Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git shortlog (issue 6206057)

Le 13/05/2012 15:24, James disait : Hello, On 13 May 2012 14:06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: It seems that this document is in the format , should be Pál Benkő (unless i'm heavily mistaken). and Hungarians happen to put the given name last in the full name. Unless I am mistaken, this is the

Re: Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git shortlog (issue 6206057)

Hello, On 13 May 2012 14:06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > >>> It seems that this document is in the format , >>> should be Pál Benkő (unless i'm heavily mistaken). >> >> and Hungarians happen to put the given name last in the full name. >> Unless I am mistaken, this is the same with "Hu Haipeng".

Re: Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git shortlog (issue 6206057)

>> It seems that this document is in the format , >> should be Pál Benkő (unless i'm heavily mistaken). > > and Hungarians happen to put the given name last in the full name. > Unless I am mistaken, this is the same with "Hu Haipeng". Isn't it a convention to use all caps surname/family name for

Re: Server at Paris VIII

Hello, On 13 May 2012 11:41, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: > To: "LilyPond-Devel list" > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:08 AM > Subject: Server at Paris VIII > > >> Hey all, >> >> Just got off the phone with John M about setting up a server at Paris >> VIII.  He'll be g

Re: Server at Paris VIII

On 13 mai 2012, at 12:41, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: > To: "LilyPond-Devel list" > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:08 AM > Subject: Server at Paris VIII > > >> Hey all, >> >> Just got off the phone with John M about setting up a server at Paris VIII. >> He'll be g

Re: Server at Paris VIII

- Original Message - From: To: "LilyPond-Devel list" Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:08 AM Subject: Server at Paris VIII Hey all, Just got off the phone with John M about setting up a server at Paris VIII. He'll be going as the LilyPond rep on Wednesday to chat with the people ther

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

New Patch. Thanks Keith and Jean-Charles http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1037 Documentation/notation/in

Server at Paris VIII

Hey all, Just got off the phone with John M about setting up a server at Paris VIII. He'll be going as the LilyPond rep on Wednesday to chat with the people there (Valentin's teaching piano and I'm in rehearsal all day, otherwise we'd all go...music gets in the way of LilyPond yet again!). Jo

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

Nitpicks, but I had to read twice and carefully the first paragraph and I'm not sure to understand. http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation

Re: web: update GSoC subpage (issue 6190068)

On 2012/05/11 09:12:05, janek wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:08 AM, wrote: > Hey Janek, > > have you seen this thread in -bug list? > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-04/msg00042.html > > I think that gsoc page should be corrected now, i.e.: > > -

Re: Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git shortlog (issue 6206057)

On 2012/05/13 07:59:25, benko.pal wrote: I don't have a strong preference either way: on one hand I like to find myself under B rather than P; on the other hand I like people not confusing my given name and surname. It makes it easier to find your mail address this way. I don't think that

Re: Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git shortlog (issue 6206057)

http://codereview.appspot.com/6206057/diff/1/.mailmap File .mailmap (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6206057/diff/1/.mailmap#newcode5 .mailmap:5: Benkő Pál On 2012/05/13 07:45:51, dak wrote: On 2012/05/13 07:13:08, janek wrote: > It seems that this document is in the format , so here

Re: LoMus 2012

m...@mikesolomon.org From: Thierry Coduys The jury wishes to congratulate you on your LilyPond open source software, that won the First Prize at the LoMus 2012 contest. A cheque or bank transfer of 2000 € will be sent to you by the AFIM w00t! Mazal tov to everyone! Belated

Re: Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git shortlog (issue 6206057)

http://codereview.appspot.com/6206057/diff/1/.mailmap File .mailmap (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6206057/diff/1/.mailmap#newcode5 .mailmap:5: Benkő Pál On 2012/05/13 07:13:08, janek wrote: It seems that this document is in the format , so here it should be Pál Benkő (unless i'm he

Re: Use fractions rather than Scheme pairs for \scaleDuration, timeSignatureFraction et al (issue 6200068)

LGTM (with Janek's suggested change) http://codereview.appspot.com/6200068/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git shortlog (issue 6206057)

one concern about Pal. http://codereview.appspot.com/6206057/diff/1/.mailmap File .mailmap (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6206057/diff/1/.mailmap#newcode5 .mailmap:5: Benkő Pál It seems that this document is in the format , so here it should be Pál Benkő (unless i'm heavily mistaken).

Re: Use fractions rather than Scheme pairs for \scaleDuration, timeSignatureFraction et al (issue 6200068)

I don't know the parser stuff (and no time to figure it out), but docs LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/6200068/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6200068/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.ite