Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

Quoting Pavel Roskin : Fedora 17 i386 has exactly the same problem. Let me try to find the file that needs to be compiled with -O1. I have some ideas how to bisect the problem. I want to write a wrapper around g++ that starts adding -O1 to the command line after N invocations. The problemat

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

Looks like it works, but I think it can (and should) be simplified. If it can't, then LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/6193043/diff/1/ly/performer-init.ly File ly/performer-init.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6193043/diff/1/ly/performer-init.ly#newcode49 ly/performer-init.ly:49:

Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

Reviewers: , Message: Here is a patch that attempts to fix issues with MIDI playback of Kievan notation. Description: Fix MIDI output for Kievan Adding KievanStaff and KievanVoice for MIDI output of Kievan notation. Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6193043/ Affected files:

PATCH: Countdown to 20120506

For 20:00 MDT Sunday May 6th Documentation: Issue 2438 : NR 1.2.3 Add explanation about reminder accidentals and \cadenzaOn - R5976056 Cheers, Colin -- I've learned that you shouldn't go t

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 4 mai 2012, at 01:23, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > > > On 4 May 2012 01:08, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On 4 mai 2012, at 00:37, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > >> On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> 2460 is more or less impossible. >> >> Why? I don know the details of Lilypo

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 4 May 2012 01:08, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On 4 mai 2012, at 00:37, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > > On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > >> *2460* is more or less impossible. > > > Why? I don know the details of Lilypond's internals, but a "white-out" is > a rather simple id

Re: Strange loop executed only once!

On 3 May 2012 04:18, Keith OHara wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2012 17:12:33 -0700, Łukasz Czerwiński < > milimet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 22 April 2012 13:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> >> this also looks a little suspect: >>> >>> Real total_head_length = previous_extents[d].length () >>

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 4 mai 2012, at 00:37, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > 2460 is more or less impossible. > > Why? I don know the details of Lilypond's internals, but a "white-out" is a > rather simple idea, isn't it? > > Łukasz > What's hard is creating flexib

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 3 May 2012 13:07, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > *2460* is more or less impossible. Why? I don know the details of Lilypond's internals, but a "white-out" is a rather simple idea, isn't it? Łukasz ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

Quoting David Kastrup : Any chance to compile using i386? If the problem persisted, it would strongly point to the language frontend of g++ being involved. If it vanishes, it can be either the backend or a general 32/64 bit architecture problem. Fedora 17 i386 has exactly the same problem.

Re: make doc and make all

- Original Message - From: "Francisco Vila" To: Cc: "Devel Team" Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 4:18 PM Subject: Re: make doc and make all 2012/5/3 m...@apollinemike.com : Hey all, I'm for the first time doing semi-complicated doc work w/ the website thing and discovering a bit abou

Re: make doc and make all

2012/5/3 m...@apollinemike.com : > Hey all, > > I'm for the first time doing semi-complicated doc work w/ the website thing > and discovering a bit about the build system in the process.  I learned today > that `make doc' does not automatically `make all' if there are files that > have been touc

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

Pavel Roskin writes: > Quoting David Kastrup : > >> Pavel Roskin writes: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> I mentioned in passing that Fedora 17 (currently in beta) ships >>> Lilypond 2.15.29 that reports bogus bar checks. >>> >>> It turns out that both the current Lilypond from git and Lilypond >>> 2.14.2

Re: make doc and make all

- Original Message - From: To: "Devel Team" Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:52 AM Subject: make doc and make all Hey all, I'm for the first time doing semi-complicated doc work w/ the website thing and discovering a bit about the build system in the process. I learned today that

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

Quoting David Kastrup : Pavel Roskin writes: Hello! I mentioned in passing that Fedora 17 (currently in beta) ships Lilypond 2.15.29 that reports bogus bar checks. It turns out that both the current Lilypond from git and Lilypond 2.14.2 are miscompiled on the up-to-date Fedora 17 so they ex

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

On 3 mai 2012, at 14:00, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: >> He plans to tackle 2451, 2452, and 2453 first via a parsing of pango strings >> to find word prefixes and suffixes and do alignment from where these lie. > > Quick question: will languages that do not use Latin characters be > considered? For e

Re: MIDI with ancient notation

Upon further investigation, I believe this is related to this issue: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2004 Aleksandr On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Andreev wrote: > Hello folks, > > I've been experimenting with what is supported so far for Kievan > notation, and I'v

Re: Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

> He plans to tackle 2451, 2452, and 2453 first via a parsing of pango strings > to find word prefixes and suffixes and do alignment from where these lie. Quick question: will languages that do not use Latin characters be considered? For example, 2452 is also a problem when working with Slavic lan

Recap of my meeting w/ Janek

Hey all, Janek and I talked at length about GSoC and I wanted to give people a little update about the game plan. He plans to tackle 2451, 2452, and 2453 first via a parsing of pango strings to find word prefixes and suffixes and do alignment from where these lie. 2454 will require spacing stu

make doc and make all

Hey all, I'm for the first time doing semi-complicated doc work w/ the website thing and discovering a bit about the build system in the process. I learned today that `make doc' does not automatically `make all' if there are files that have been touched. Would it be a good idea to roll a make