On 27 avr. 2012, at 23:55, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:01:04 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>
>> On 27 avr. 2012, at 19:58, Keith OHara wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote:
Call pure function puts start and end in the final two slots.
>>
>>
On 2012/04/28 03:08:13, Pavel Roskin wrote:
OK, the problem I wanted to address is to have a documented way to
define new
grobs. I hoped that moving add-grob-definition to a "public place"
would be a
good start. If it's not, sorry for the noise.
scheme-text-spanner.ly contains a lot of co
Reviewers: dak, c_sorensen_byu.edu,
Message:
OK, the problem I wanted to address is to have a documented way to
define new grobs. I hoped that moving add-grob-definition to a "public
place" would be a good start. If it's not, sorry for the noise.
Description:
Move add-grob-definition from a sn
Carl Sorensen writes:
On 4/27/12 4:00 PM, "d...@gnu.org" wrote:
Instead, one can just add a single context mod adding the new grob
definition to the Score context definition.
It would make more sense to revert the respective commit creating the
snippet completely.
http://coderevi
On 4/27/12 4:00 PM, "d...@gnu.org" wrote:
>
>Instead, one can just add a single context mod adding the new grob
>definition to the Score context definition.
>
>It would make more sense to revert the respective commit creating the
>snippet completely.
>
>http://codereview.appspot.com/6128048/
It is not the "official" way to create a new grob definition, but a hack
from Mike done without understanding the implementation of
\grobdefinitions. It is not just tampering with a global variable
(session-wide instead of parser-wide) to add stuff to
all-grob-descriptions, it is also inefficient
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:01:04 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
On 27 avr. 2012, at 19:58, Keith OHara wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote:
Call pure function puts start and end in the final two slots.
You're right that, in the code above, the function gleaned from (cdr pure
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:01:10 -0500
David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been experimenting with a way to create a measure-counter (issue
> 2445), and I've come up with the attached Scheme engraver. The music
> within a count doesn't need to be repeated to use it.
>
> This creates a new gro
On 27 avr. 2012, at 21:01, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
> Your right that, in the code above, the function gleaned from (cdr pure) gets
> passed (list (car args) start end (cdr args)). I'm not exactly sure what
> that signifies, but that's what's going on. When in doubt, I always just use
>
On 27 avr. 2012, at 19:58, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:02:51 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>
>> On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:45, Keith OHara wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote:
>>>
lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SC
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:02:51 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:45, Keith OHara wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote:
lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM
prev_offset,
You're right - this is an error. Do you want me to
- Original Message -
From: "James"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; ; ;
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue
6109046)
You then need to tick a box more or two to enable that stuff in VBox
or KVM. Remember though that L
Hello,
On 27 April 2012 15:56, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> It may depend on your hardware whether this makes sense. My Ubuntu build
> box can multithread within the VM, whereas my (older) Windows box can't.
Depends on the paravirtualization.
eg.
http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/linux/linux-tip-how-
On 2012/04/27 08:49:09, Graham Percival wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6092045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6092045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi#newcode
- Original Message -
From:
To: "James"
Cc: ; ;
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue
6109046)
On 26 avr. 2012, at 11:43, James wrote:
Mike,
On 26 April 2012 08:51, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
On 26 avr. 2
On 26 avr. 2012, at 11:43, James wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On 26 April 2012 08:51, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 26 April 2012 07:55, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote:
>>>
On 27 April 2012 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> *sigh*
> I'll rehash an old email.
>
>
> I know that some of us would like to get paid for lilypond work.
> But I'm leery of jumping into this topic for a few reasons:
>
> 1) lilypond survives because of volunteer work. I think we should
> be *e
Musical contest? Great! :) +1
On 27 April 2012 07:29, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> I suggest that *you* are the person receiving the money, acting as a
> representative and contact person for this contest. In due course it
> is up to you how to distribute the money within the lilypond
> developmen
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:18:23AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
>
> I mean: I thought it was Jan.
yeah, it's Jan.
- Graham
_
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
I mean: I thought it was Jan.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel
Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway? I thought it was, but I might be mistaken.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:19:55AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Is it possilble to display the contents of the twitter #lilypond
>> hashtag and/or @lilypond twitt
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:19:55AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Is it possilble to display the contents of the twitter #lilypond
> hashtag and/or @lilypond twitter account in an iframe instead? If we
> use actual twitter, we would get some publicity on twitter.com too.
It's certainly possible,
Totally off the wall idea here:
Is it possilble to display the contents of the twitter #lilypond
hashtag and/or @lilypond twitter account in an iframe instead? If we
use actual twitter, we would get some publicity on twitter.com too.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:52 AM, wrote:
> Hmm...it looks like
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> The form says:
>
> * In case of a collective work, I have been appointed to represent my
> colleagues.
>
> As a core contributor to LilyPond I hereby nominate Mike Solomon to
> represent the LilyPond project.
>
> Let's worry about what to do with money if and when we wi
The form says:
* In case of a collective work, I have been appointed to represent my
colleagues.
As a core contributor to LilyPond I hereby nominate Mike Solomon to
represent the LilyPond project.
Let's worry about what to do with money if and when we win.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:09 AM, m...
On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:45, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote:
>
>> lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM
>> prev_offset,
>>
>> You're right - this is an error. Do you want me to fix it or are you
>> working on a patch into which the f
On 27/04/2012 07:09, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from
> Valentin about:
>
> http://concours.afim-asso.org/
>
> I've been reticent about applying because the development community is
> rather diffuse and there isn't any goo
Graham Percival writes:
> Then we'll have hard numbers on which developers are abusing the
> process. I mean, sure, we all know whose patches tend to be great
> and whose patches tend to be problematic... but a completely
> automated, objective approach would remove any personal bias.
And those
On 27 avr. 2012, at 10:55, David Kastrup wrote:
> gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
>
>> LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
>>
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
>> File Documentation/web.texi (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/60
gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
> LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
> File Documentation/web.texi (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi#newcode172
> Documentati
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:28:54AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> There is no reason whatsoever that this should only be done by a single
> person.
Totally!
> I would expect that _every_ person contributing more than two
> patches per month should be able, after uploading a patch, to be running
>
Graham Percival writes:
> 3) it's not going to be enough. Companies and government grants
> are where the real money for supporting programmers comes from;
> hiring just one person from individual donations would require far
> more users than we have.
Not enough is better than nothing if we are
http://codereview.appspot.com/6092045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6092045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi#newcode81
Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi:81
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> Hey all,
>
> I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from
> Valentin about:
>
> http://concours.afim-asso.org/
>
> I've been reticent about applying because the development community is
> rather diffuse and there isn't any good way to accept
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> OK. Regtest checking can mean three things. 1) Between releases,
> comparing the output of the regtests with what they looked like before
> and flagging any differences as potential problems. I do this. 2)
> Doing the same thing for patches. Patchy does this, helped b
Mike,
On 27 April 2012 07:41, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On 27 avr. 2012, at 07:08, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> My website build crashes with:
>>
>> mikesol@mikesol-laptop:~/lilypond-git$ sudo make
>> LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=/home/mikesol/lilypond-extra website
>> make --
wrote Friday, April 27, 2012 8:39 AM
On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:33, Trevor Daniels wrote:
But it seems the closing date has passed - wasn't it 25 April?
It's extended till the 29th.
Ah, good! If they needed to do that the chance
of winning is somewhat increased :)
Trevor
___
On 2012/04/27 07:58:50, mike7 wrote:
> Have you tried adding it to line 26 of git-cl ?
mimetypes.add_type("application/xml", ".xml")
But to no avail :(
ok, fair enough. It's a small, new, file, and can see the entire thing
by following the "download" link next to the filename in rietveld.
On 2012/04/27 07:55:54, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
File Documentation/web.texi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi#newcode172
Docu
On 2012/04/27 07:53:06, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2012/04/27 07:49:30, mike7 wrote:
> I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely
with the
.xml
> extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
Have you tried adding it to line 26 of git-cl ?
I added:
mi
LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
File Documentation/web.texi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi#newcode172
Documentation/web.texi:172: xhttp=new
ActiveXObject("Micr
On 2012/04/27 07:49:30, mike7 wrote:
I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely with
the .xml
extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
Have you tried adding it to line 26 of git-cl ?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/
_
Hmm...it looks like the xml mime type is defined, so I'm short on ideas
for why it's not uploading to Rietveld correctly.
Below are the contents of tweets.xml:
The Ensemble 101 is going on a European tour where they'll sing music
typeset using LilyPond. Click Re: Macro for(UP_and_DOWN) and 3 similar. (issue 2491) (issue 6109046)
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6109046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6105049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely with
the .xml extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
Hey all,
The new patchset puts the tweets in a separate xml file. I use xml
instead of txt to avoid parsing annoyances. The only problem is that,
because the xml is in a DOM structure, the individual tweets can't
contain sub-nodes, which means that if someone wants to use anchor tags
or whateve
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:24 -0700, wrote:
lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM
prev_offset,
You're right - this is an error. Do you want me to fix it or are you
working on a patch into which the fix could be incorporated?
I am re-ordering the arguments in th
On 27 avr. 2012, at 09:33, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG wrote Friday, April 27, 2012 6:29 AM
>>> I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from
>>> Valentin about:
>>> http://concours.afim-asso.org/
>> Aah, very nice! Yes, participating in this contest would be a goo
Werner LEMBERG wrote Friday, April 27, 2012 6:29 AM
I've received a couple e-mails from colleagues and one nudge from
Valentin about:
http://concours.afim-asso.org/
Aah, very nice! Yes, participating in this contest would be a good
thing; and thanks for your offer to writing up the applicat
50 matches
Mail list logo
