Re: lilypond bug 2368

2012-04-10 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Colin Hall wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 05:32:28PM +0200, Karol Majewski wrote: >> >> Is it possible to mark 2368 bug as critical? I think this kind of >> regression is a serious problem. Just take a look at my last >> comment: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/

PATCH: Countdown to 20120412

2012-04-10 Thread Colin Campbell
For 20:00 MDT Thursday April 12 Enhancement: Issue 2470 : Patch: introduce completionUnit - R5987060 Issue 2427 : Patch: Add an e

Re: Update Rietveld patches

2012-04-10 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote: > Shouldn't git cl be rewritten to change the title of Rietveld issue to > include Google Code's issue numer? sure, go ahead. I don't have time because of gsoc. cheers, Janek ___ lilypond-devel

Re: Update Rietveld patches

2012-04-10 Thread Łukasz Czerwiński
Both done - closing issues on Rietveld and adding 2310 to Rietveld's title. On 3 April 2012 04:00, Colin Campbell wrote: > > Tools which we have written for the purpose are aware of the two > unconnected sources of information about patches and have been modified to > allow you to refer to an ex

Re: templates and a little bit more

2012-04-10 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
On 06.04.2012 13:17, Janek Warchoł wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: Dear community, I bundled some extensions in a little package to try out. Some of these ideas might be interesting to include in lily. Here is a start of some docs, but just a little bit. I am work

Re: Staging/Master Merge - James' Patchy

2012-04-10 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: >> >> We use the staging branch exactly to avoid having to revert stuff. >> Instead we reset staging. Only stuff that percolated to master needs to >> get reverted in order to remove it. >> >> -- >> David Kast

Re: Staging/Master Merge - James' Patchy

2012-04-10 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: We use the staging branch exactly to avoid having to revert stuff. Instead we reset staging. Only stuff that percolated to master needs to get reverted in order to remove it. -- David Kastrup What's the syntax to do that, please? --

Re: Staging/Master Merge - James' Patchy

2012-04-10 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > If I could have worked out how to split them, while at the same time > being able to keep track of what changes were still needed, I would > have done. However, doing things like having a screech-boink.ly in > new, with a screech-and-boink.ly in snippets, and remembering t