Re: Google Summer of Code - Ideas List, please discuss

> Somewhat independently, there is a mf2pt1.pl Perl script that > (shudder) generates .pe script to transform a metapost output to a > Type 1 font. I guess that could be done more concisely directly as > a python script. This sounds like a very nice addition. Maybe generating Python should be t

PATCH: Countdown to 20120223

For 20:00 MST Thursday, February 23 Enhancement: Issue 2319 : Patch: Web&CG: remove "projects" from HelpUs - R 5665047 Issue 2336

Re: Google Summer of Code - Ideas List, please discuss

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > In another thread Han-Wen wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> Also, nowadays, fontforge supports Python scripting. We could redo all >> the craziness involving generated files and legacy .pe scripts in >> p

New Italian PO file for 'lilypond' (version 2.15.29)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted by the Italian team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/it.po (We can arrange things so tha

Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:53:52PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Graham Percival > wrote: > > Maybe wait 12 hours in case somebody else wants to do it, then try > > to contact the FSF yourself.  Applications start tomorrow and only > > run for a bit over a week, >

Re: Web&CG: remove "projects" from HelpUs (issue 5665047)

On 2012/02/14 18:48:42, Graham Percival wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/5665047/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode515 Documentation/web/community.itexi:515: @helpusAdvanced I'm ok with this change, but the @helpusProjects should be in a @divClass{column-center-bottom}. On We

Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:39:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> I'm not familiar with IRS forms, but i guess the "umbrella >> organizations" part concerns us and FSF/GNU. >> Shall i contact FSF or maybe someone who is more widely recogni

Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:57:54PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > oh, I see. That was actually a clean-up from 2.15.30, because the > > tag got lost because release/unstable didn't merge into master > > properly. (why? no clue; I just followed the instructions in the

Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:39:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > I think FSF/GNU project can and has acted as organization in the past. > > I guess so. GSoC FAQ says this: > > "5. What tax related documentation is required from mentor

Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:51:03PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> Why is your organization applying to participate in Google Summer of >> Code 2012? What do you hope to gain by participating? >>     Most importantly: more contributors >>  

Re: Google Summer of Code - Ideas List, please discuss

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:41 PM, pls wrote: > Yes, you're right.  But I'd say the other results are also interesting > because they show that the same .xml-file is represented differently by > different notation softwares (e.g. concerning page breaks , lyrics...) Sure; it's far from being perf

Re: Google Summer of Code - Ideas List, please discuss

Am 21.02.2012 um 22:04 schrieb Janek Warchoł: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:56 PM, pls wrote: >> >> Am 16.02.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys >>> What happens if you take a fully formatted file from Finale and load >>> it into Sibelius via the musicxml route, and the reverse? Is anyone >>>

Re: Google Summer of Code - Ideas List, please discuss

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > Please give your suggested projects. In another thread Han-Wen wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Also, nowadays, fontforge supports Python scripting. We could redo all > the craziness involving generated fi

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:22 PM, m...@apollinemike.com < m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: >> >> > I've now optimized the crap out of this sucker and ca

Re: Google Summer of Code - Ideas List, please discuss

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:56 PM, pls wrote: > > Am 16.02.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys >> What happens if you take a fully formatted file from Finale and load >> it into Sibelius via the musicxml route, and the reverse? Is anyone >> able to post the before and after PDFs of such a transit

Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

Graham Percival writes: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:40:26PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> I just bungled staging with bad Texinfo in a regtest and saw that you >> merged into it right after that, presumably because of a release. I can >> either replace the merge (it will no longer have the sam

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2012, at 1:58 AM, Joe Neeman wrote: >> By the way, could you update your git branch please? > > Will do once we finish this exchange & I get a clean version up. I will check my test files once you do this; meanwhile here

Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:40:26PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > I just bungled staging with bad Texinfo in a regtest and saw that you > merged into it right after that, presumably because of a release. I can > either replace the merge (it will no longer have the same commit id) or > throw it out

Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

Graham Percival writes: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:49:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Uh, Graham? Just fixed another regression discovered by an LSR failure >> and pushed to staging. It would appear that this needs to be in 2.16 >> according to our policies. > > Well, there's already 2 Cr

Re: Examples page?

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > See here: > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/examples > > This seems to me to be a hangover to the days when the web site didn't have > the nice examples on > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web/examples.  It seemed > complete in 2.1

Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:49:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Uh, Graham? Just fixed another regression discovered by an LSR failure > and pushed to staging. It would appear that this needs to be in 2.16 > according to our policies. Well, there's already 2 Critical issues, and I think that 23

Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

David Kastrup writes: > Thomas Morley writes: > >> I didn't manage to fix: >> filtering-parts-from-the-command-line.ly > > You just did not try hard enough. It was a really obscure bug in the > lexer. I'll commit a fix to staging once make check goes through. > > I think I need a beer. Uh, Gr

Re: My own Figured Bass number set, where do I start?

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:26:36 +0100 Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > On 20/02/2012 14:44, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > On 20/02/2012 14:18, Nils wrote: > >> my pusblisher wants baroque figured bass gylphs. They have the strokes in > >> different places than the Lilypond versions. > >> I guess nobobd

Re: Build: Remove .PRECIOUS flags. (issue 5688059)

On 2012/02/21 10:36:08, Graham Percival wrote: LGTM. If David agrees, then I support pushing this to staging immediately. The claim is that declaring files as ".SECONDARY" is enough for not having them cleaned up unnecessarily (and likely in conflict with parallel makes). After reading the "m

Re: Build: Remove .PRECIOUS flags. (issue 5688059)

LGTM. If David agrees, then I support pushing this to staging immediately. http://codereview.appspot.com/5688059/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Build: Don't use immediate expansion of variable. (issue 5689058)

LGTM, please push to staging immediately. http://codereview.appspot.com/5689058/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Build: Don't use immediate expansion of variable. (issue 5689058)

Reviewers: dak, Message: Please review. Description: Build: Don't use immediate expansion of variable. For out-of-source builds, get rid of this warning: ls: cannot access ../../Documentation/snippets/*.ly: No such file Ref: http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-devel@gnu.org/msg42975.html Ple

Build: Remove .PRECIOUS flags. (issue 5688059)

Reviewers: dak, Message: Please review. Description: Build: Remove .PRECIOUS flags. Since 820c7ff5d380e8ca52057717ab3176b5e40107fd all files are treated as .SECONDARY files. This means that `make' will not delete files that it identifies as intermediate files, which would be it's default behavi