Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
[...]
It is not clear where this mail hails from, which commands were used to
get this error under which circumstances.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
Von: LilyPond Development
Gesendet : Di., 14. Feb. 2012 01:39:05 CET
An: reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at
Betreff: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2012.02.14-01:39)
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Calculating line breaks...
> Drawing systems...
> Writing header
2012/2/13 Graham Percival :
> ... that said, I see those files in lilypond-extra/pictures/, so
> maybe they _are_ needed. Hmm, the only way to find out is to try
> reading make/website.make, and/or doing a few experiments.
I'm afraid I will not have time for this before Thursday. Sorry. Next
week
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 02:46:01PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> > Images should be pushed along other changes, and also to our branch.
> > Graham has to authorize something afterwards for those to be visible.
> > Forwarding to him.
Not any
Am 13.02.2012 um 13:36 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
>>
>> Am 11.02.2012 um 19:57 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>>
>>> Yes, and I'm aware of that two-line fix. It gives ppc support, but I
>>> think it also gives a bad version of LilyPond wh
Le 13/02/2012 14:56, julien.ri...@gmail.com disait :
Looks good, I just have a few suggestions to avoid clashing log file
names and I wonder how this part of GOP 9 might be implemented down the
road:
"All other logfiles will go in the @file{build/logfiles/} directory."
http://codereview.appspot
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:47:22PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > My rule of thumb is that if I don't understand something easily,
> > then at least 50% of future lilypond contributors won't understand
> > it either.
>
> eval is ugly and a little-travelled corner, an
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
>>
>> scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1
>>
>> Actually, it is totally basic shell scripting here.
>
> Well, apparently you don't need "basic" shell scripting for 7
> years of full-time linu
Looks good, I just have a few suggestions to avoid clashing log file
names and I wonder how this part of GOP 9 might be implemented down the
road:
"All other logfiles will go in the @file{build/logfiles/} directory."
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/5003/Documentation/GNUmakefile
File
On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:50 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:47 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
>>
>> I did some experiments with caching that are up on:
>> dev/skylines-cached
>
> Hey all,
>
> Fresh branch up at
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Christian Hitz wrote:
>
> Am 11.02.2012 um 19:57 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>
> > Yes, and I'm aware of that two-line fix. It gives ppc support, but I
> > think it also gives a bad version of LilyPond when the About menu item is
> > checked. I may be wrong
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> I disagree. Reading code the first time is hard, that is true, but
>> unless anything surprising is happening, it does not deserve a
>> comment. The more you read code, the easier it becomes, and think of
>> this as you learning how to rea
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, wrote:
>
>> Well, the main point of the comment is not describing parameters, but
>> the function itself. Believe me or not, we spent 10 minutes figuring
>> out _what the hell_ are apes doing here and whether there are any
>> bananas
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> SUMMARY: in order to participate in Google Summer of Code ($$$), we
> need an Ideas List.
I think the most interesting is probably #1 (grace note
synchronization) and #2 (musicxml). Of those, I recommend #2 over #1,
since the g
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:27 AM, wrote:
> Yes - someone who knows this code :] Possibly one day someone will try
> to refactor this code, what will mean that he understands it well.
> For me it's really hard to understand whats going on here. Me and Janek
> recently spent a couple of hours tryi
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, wrote:
>> somebody proposed a change, it was resisted because the do{}
>
> flip(d)!=UP idiom
>>
>> seemed simple enough to be acceptable.
>
>
> It took us a while to figure out what's going on with the do{}
> flip(d)!=UP thing.
> If it was up to me, i'd just writ
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1
>
> Actually, it is totally basic shell scripting here.
Well, apparently you don't need "basic" shell scripting for 7
years of full-time linux use and 4 years of macosx use, and
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc
File lily/note-collision.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc#newcode587
lily/note-collision.cc:587: for_UP_and_DOWN (d)
On 2012/02/13 11:33:48, hanwenn wrote:
after reading some of th
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc
File lily/note-collision.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5651069/diff/1/lily/note-collision.cc#newcode536
lily/note-collision.cc:536: s[LEFT]--; // why LEFT and RIGHT instead of
UP and DOWN?
sometimes i liked to think
Comments added describing eval line.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ; ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: Final redirection of texi output (issue 5650064)
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh
File scripts/build/run-and-check.sh (right):
http
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh
File scripts/build/run-and-check.sh (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh#newcode2
scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1
On 2012/02/13 10:53:44, Graham P
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5504092/diff/20001/scripts/auxiliar/lily-git.tcl
File scripts/auxiliar/lily-git.tcl (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5504092/diff/20001/scripts/auxiliar/lily-git.tcl#newcode248
scripts/auxiliar/lily-git.tcl:248: git remote add -t $originHead \
This shoul
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh
File scripts/build/run-and-check.sh (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5650064/diff/4001/scripts/build/run-and-check.sh#newcode2
scripts/build/run-and-check.sh:2: eval $1 > $2 2>&1
I know this has already be
24 matches
Mail list logo
