On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:06 PM, James wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for testing, James. :)
>
>
> Downloading now. My Internet connection is not that fast, so I'll leave it
> run over night (it's late here) and then have a go at building LP with it
> tomorrow morning/early afternoon BST.
>
> I'll let you kn
Hello,
On 10 December 2011 14:44, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, James wrote:
> >
> > and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing
> else but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple
> of years.
> >
> >
>
> Uploading
Hi David,
2011/12/9 David Nalesnik :
> Hi Harm,
>
> (...) looking
> with fresh eyes at the file I just attached, I really should have condensed
> that list of nearly identical offset calculations. (See attached for the
> way I came up with.)
thanks for doing this! I did the next step to simplify
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Benkő Pál wrote:
>> I suggested it mainly b/c Ubuntu has very different UI in new
>> releases, the Unity DE. For ubuntu 12.04 (next LTS release coming in
>> spring) we may want to switch to xfce or switch to Debian completely.
>> I can do whatever y'all want.
>
> L
Keith OHara writes:
> mike apollinemike.com apollinemike.com> writes:
>
>> Before I reinvent the wheel, does the code base have something like
>> Interval::contains that accepts an interval as an argument instead of a
>> point?
>>
>
> Well, there is Interval::superset() if you like
> object-
mike apollinemike.com apollinemike.com> writes:
> Before I reinvent the wheel, does the code base have something like
> Interval::contains that accepts an interval as an argument instead of a point?
>
Well, there is Interval::superset() if you like object-oriented-obfuscation,
but it would be
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, James wrote:
>
> and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing else
> but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple of
> years.
>
>
Uploading now. Give it about an hour from the timestamp on this email.
Filesize
> I suggested it mainly b/c Ubuntu has very different UI in new
> releases, the Unity DE. For ubuntu 12.04 (next LTS release coming in
> spring) we may want to switch to xfce or switch to Debian completely.
> I can do whatever y'all want.
Lubuntu?
___
l
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:18:40AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> Ok great. Compiling fontforge 20110222 with --enable-double now to
>> test it. shouldn't take long to get new iso ready.
>
> Forgive me if this is obvious, but have you done
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:18:40AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Ok great. Compiling fontforge 20110222 with --enable-double now to
> test it. shouldn't take long to get new iso ready.
Forgive me if this is obvious, but have you done all the things
listed here?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/is
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, so I just add these to .bashrc right?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Does this mean the lily-git.tcl script has changed too?
>
> lily-git.tcl has not changed yet, but hopefully it will soon. And
> if it doesn't, there's no big worries: nothing
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:01:27AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > export LILYPOND_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-git/
> > export LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-web-media-git/
>
> Thanks, so I just add these to .bashrc right?
Yes.
> Does th
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 06:09:22AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>>
>> Ok I can make these changes to the current setup. Haven't heard of
>> $LILYPOND_GIT but I guess it's in the CG so I'll take a look.
>
> export LILYPOND_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 06:09:22AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
> Ok I can make these changes to the current setup. Haven't heard of
> $LILYPOND_GIT but I guess it's in the CG so I'll take a look.
export LILYPOND_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-git/
export LILYPOND_WEB_MEDIA_GIT=$HOME/lilypond-web-media-git/
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, James wrote:
> hello
>
> and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing else
> but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple of
> years.
>
Thanks James that'd be great. I'll post a link for you when it's ready.
J
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:35:36AM -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> I could probably do it again. Maybe Debian would be better base so it
>> wouldn't need upgrading as much?
>
> This upgrade is to match our changing development requirements,
>
Hey all,
Before I reinvent the wheel, does the code base have something like
Interval::contains that accepts an interval as an argument instead of a point?
I could do
Interval foo(-1,1);
Interval bar (0, 2);
Direction d = LEFT;
contains = false;
do
{
contains |= foo.contains(bar[d]);
}
while
"Xavier Scheuer" wrote in message
news:cadgqhrcpnhhyjuxwenkge0gsh6a5yrv3xxqcjoxk2rsqs1p...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi Joe, dear developers, bug squad,
Issue 1377 is tagged as "Patch-push" since more than one month now,
should it be pushed, go under a countdown?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issue
On 10 December 2011 00:45, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> I cannot display it, either.
>
> In scm/define-grobs.scm, the SpacingSpanner grob is set with a
> base-shortest-duration of 3/16, and shortest-duration-space is set to 2.0
IIUC common-shortest-duration is different from base-shortest-duration.
b
On 10 December 2011 11:25, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> Then you could complain about the bug squad. I recommend
> complaining very politely, because they're volunteering their time
> and you're not... but at least you'd be talking to the right
> people.
I just sent a clearer request to bug-lilypo
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:18:22AM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On 10 December 2011 02:41, Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> > Seriously, Xavier. You should know how things work by now.
>
> Seriously, Graham. I sent a message to bug-lilypond three days ago.
Then you could complain about the bug s
On 10 December 2011 02:41, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> That's a feature request from at least 7 years ago. It's not at
> all new. If you want to get it "in the system", send it to
> bug-lilypond.
>
> Seriously, Xavier. You should know how things work by now.
Seriously, Graham. I sent a message
http://codereview.appspot.com/5453066/diff/3001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5453066/diff/3001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode528
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:528: patterns, see the snip
23 matches
Mail list logo
