Re: Remove spurious spaces from music expression display, adapt tests. (issue 5437140)

2011-12-05 Thread lemzwerg
David, I suggest to apply patches of that kind directly to the repository without setting up a Rietveld issue. http://codereview.appspot.com/5437140/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypon

Remove spurious spaces from music expression display, adapt tests. (issue 5437140)

2011-12-05 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
LGTM. Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/5437140/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: xml-script

2011-12-05 Thread Juro
> There is . This > should give you some suggestion both about other people's willingness to > contribute and the amount of payment which is "not yet" sufficient to > make somebody go for this project. Thank you for the link. I wonder, that it is not in this mailinglist. (I don't have no googlem

$LILYHOME as $TEXMFHOME with LaTeX

2011-12-05 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Hi, thanks a lot for developing and maintaining LilyPond! I read the way of including LilyPond files here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files.html especially the way where one can avoid to specify the (relative or absolute) path of the included file:

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-05 Thread Phil Holmes
That format is suggested from the "simple tasks" here: http://lilypond.org/help-us.html Dunno why right now, but that page points at 2.13 docs. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list

Re: Why no review on Doc: NR 1.6.2 - Staff Symbol?

2011-12-05 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:39:03AM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > Le Dec 4, 2011 à 11:27 AM, Graham Percival a écrit : > > > This is *NOT* directed at programmers. Programmers should keep on > > programming. This is directed at users. > > I think this is a great idea - I'm sure that ther

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-05 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Le Dec 4, 2011 à 11:00 PM, Ralf Mattes a écrit : > IMHO, "messy" spots attract more messy kludges - you might need you patch > just for your next project, but once it's in there's a good chance that it'll > stay and people will use it instead of doing it correctly. > I see what your saying and d

Re: Allows for framing comments in LilyPond backends. (issue 5450086)

2011-12-05 Thread pkx166h
http://codereview.appspot.com/5450086/diff/3001/scm/define-grob-properties.scm File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5450086/diff/3001/scm/define-grob-properties.scm#newcode310 scm/define-grob-properties.scm:310: stencilfied of a grob in a given backend.") Mi

Re: More nuanced BarLine extra-spacing-height to allow tighter horizontal spacing (issue 5434104)

2011-12-05 Thread David Kastrup
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > Le Dec 5, 2011 à 8:52 AM, d...@gnu.org a écrit : >> >>> IF .NOT.has-span-bar(UP) >>> esh(UP) = min(esh(UP), 1.01) >>> ENDIF >>> IF .NOT.( has-span-bar(DOWN).AND.allow-span-bar ) >>> esh(DOWN)= max(esh(DOWN), -1.01) >>> ENDIF >> >> No, this is just Mike's en

Re: More nuanced BarLine extra-spacing-height to allow tighter horizontal spacing (issue 5434104)

2011-12-05 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
Le Dec 5, 2011 à 8:52 AM, d...@gnu.org a écrit : > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm > File scm/output-lib.scm (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5434104/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode408 > scm/output-lib.scm:408: (define-public > (pure-from-neighbor-in