PATCH: Countdow3n to 20111117

For 16:59 MDT Thursday November 15 Today, the subject is accurate: just one for your consideration: Issue 2039 : Patch: lexer.ll: Allow include file names to be specified as Scheme expression - R 5369104

Re: Adds some info about pure properties to the CG. (issue 5364048)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5364048/diff/4001/Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi File Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5364048/diff/4001/Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi#newcode1836 Documentation/contributor/p

Re: Nonfastforwarding push to staging

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 08:10:06PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > It would look somewhat like the following (untested) -snip- > However, in order not to give Savannah hackers too many headaches, I'd > recommend that you create a special user account for administration

Re: Adds some info about pure properties to the CG. (issue 5364048)

sure, looks fine. It's more important to get stuff into the CG than it is to fuss about the formatting or literary references. http://codereview.appspot.com/5364048/diff/4001/Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi File Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi (right): http://

Re: scm_local_eval is not available in Guile V2.

David Kastrup writes: > Ian Hulin writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> The latest git now dies on my V2 Guile system with >> .../lily/parse-scm.cc:59:64: error 'scm_local_eval' was not declared in >> this scope. > > Related. #{ ... #} is evaluated in the lexical context of the > surrounding function. Is

Re: Pushing patches to staging

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:43 PM > Subject: Re: Pushing patches to staging > > > Thanks, David. I've seen your earlier mail where you recommend: > > "Make sure that you fetch dev/staging. I find it e

Re: Pushing patches to staging

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:43 PM Subject: Re: Pushing patches to staging "Phil Holmes" writes: - Original Message - From: "Carl Sorensen" [snip] No -- your set of commands will *NOT* work. No, this set of my com

Re: Pushing patches to staging

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "Carl Sorensen" > > [snip] > >> No -- your set of commands will *NOT* work. > >> No, this set of my commands is not correct, because staging can be reset. >> So we never want to merge on it, and the git pull commands will do a >> merg

Re: Pushing patches to staging

- Original Message - From: "Carl Sorensen" [snip] No -- your set of commands will *NOT* work. No, this set of my commands is not correct, because staging can be reset. So we never want to merge on it, and the git pull commands will do a merge. I will get a revised set of comman

Re: scm_local_eval is not available in Guile V2.

Ian Hulin writes: > Hi all, > > The latest git now dies on my V2 Guile system with > .../lily/parse-scm.cc:59:64: error 'scm_local_eval' was not declared in > this scope. > > From Guile V2 NEWS > ++ > ** No more `local-eval' > >

scm_local_eval is not available in Guile V2.

Hi all, The latest git now dies on my V2 Guile system with .../lily/parse-scm.cc:59:64: error 'scm_local_eval' was not declared in this scope. >From Guile V2 NEWS ++ ** No more `local-eval' `local-eval' used to exist so that one

Re: Thinking about another disruptive change

Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > Am 2011-11-15 10:49, schrieb David Kastrup: >> The "principle of lazy complication" would keep material as simple as >> feasible until a more complicated version is asked for. >> >> That is, when a music function asks for a "scheme?" argument and the >> input is just

Re: Thinking about another disruptive change

Am 2011-11-15 10:49, schrieb David Kastrup: > The "principle of lazy complication" would keep material as simple as > feasible until a more complicated version is asked for. > > That is, when a music function asks for a "scheme?" argument and the > input is just c', it gets a pitch. If it asks for

Thinking about another disruptive change

Hi, in my quest for getting things to work more straightforwardly, I am currently stuck on several frontiers. With regard to parsing music function arguments, I have in some instances adopted a principle of "lazy complication". For example, assume that you are in lyrics mode, and a music functi