On Oct 4, 2011, at 8:48 AM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Passes make but fails make check. Cannot see where I just get
>
> --snip--
>
> job 0 terminated with signal: 11
> fatal error: Children (0) exited with errors.
> command failed: /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/bin/lilypond -I
> /home/jlow
Passes make but fails make check. Cannot see where I just get
--snip--
job 0 terminated with signal: 11
fatal error: Children (0) exited with errors.
command failed: /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/bin/lilypond -I
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/input/regression/ -I ./out-test -I
/home/jlowe/lilypon
Hey all,
Currently, I've written the function Grob::vertical_less such that it returns
true for a grob that is higher than another grob. This is because the ordering
of a vertical alignment's element list goes from top to bottom, so the vertical
axis groups with lower indices in the list are h
passes make and make check
http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hey Reinhold et al,
This newest patch set should do the trick for automatic numbering.
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/4877041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Oct 3, 2011, at 8:24 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> Mike,
> Maybe your flower/out didn't get rebuilt after config
> --disable-optimising. I had to rm flower/out/*
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/diff/29001/lily/slur-scoring.cc
> File lily/slur-scoring.cc (right):
>
> http://co
Mike this patch no longer applies to current tree. I get failed hunks.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4825051/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I've taken care of the issues Bertrand points out in #46. There are
still some issues outstanding. The code in output-lib.scm is probably
not the best way of doing this. Also, the Kievan bar line does not
appear correctly.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4951062/
__
On Oct 3, 2011, at 6:53 AM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
> i know it's annoying, but could you separate out the cosmetics (adding _
> ) to members from the rest of this change? The cosmetic changes make it
> difficult to see the essence of what you are trying to do.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.
On Oct 3, 2011, at 6:53 AM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
> i know it's annoying, but could you separate out the cosmetics (adding _
> ) to members from the rest of this change? The cosmetic changes make it
> difficult to see the essence of what you are trying to do.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:16:01AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>>
>> > If you could leave this up for another week, that'll give me time to
>> > collect the bounty on it.
>>
>> Since a reward loses its meaning if you need to invest w
http://codereview.appspot.com/4639065/diff/42001/lily/stem.cc
File lily/stem.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4639065/diff/42001/lily/stem.cc#newcode855
lily/stem.cc:855: if (attach && !scm_is_eq (style, ly_symbol2scm
("mensural"))
On 2011/10/03 08:52:27, Bertrand Bordage wrote:
By def
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:16:01AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
> > If you could leave this up for another week, that'll give me time to
> > collect the bounty on it.
>
> Since a reward loses its meaning if you need to invest weeks of
> bartering, running after
Thanks Keith, I'll quickly fix that in a new issue.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4639065/diff/42001/lily/stem.cc
File lily/stem.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4639065/diff/42001/lily/stem.cc#newcode853
lily/stem.cc:853: extract_grob_set (me, "note-heads", heads);
... OK.
http://cod
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> Issue 737: Enhancement: support for footnotes and/or endnotes.
>
>
> If you could leave this up for another week, that'll give me time to
> collect the bounty on it.
I don't find that keeping a patch back helps. I tried work for hire
(sending the respe
added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1953
http://codereview.appspot.com/4825051/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and make check
http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make. I get a few reg tests pop up; see attached at
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1952#c1
but also
'spanner-break-overshoot.log'
gives me:
--snip--
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Calculating line breaks...
Drawing systems...
-programming err
Passes Make and there are reg tests that show up but I can see no
significant changes at first glance.
See:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1266#c7
http://codereview.appspot.com/5174043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-dev
19 matches
Mail list logo
