2011/7/17 Janek Warchoł :
> I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc
> but found nothing...
I believe it defaults to ly:grob::stencil-width (probably in grob.cc).
Cheers,
Joe
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@g
LGTM
There is some code that adjusts for the shape of the notehead as well
(look for calls to
Note_head::stem_attachment_coordinate). Can you have a look if you can
work that into your code too?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4752048/
___
lilypond-deve
2011/7/16 Janek Warchoł :
>> This is exactly the thin edge of the \override glyph
>> wedge I was worried about earlier :( We already have
>> too many overrides.
>
> I think we shouldn't delete it immediately. We sometimes leave old
> syntax for some time; let's keep old clef glyph until 2.18. T
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:31 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
>
> I'm gonna pull this patch out of consideration - both you and Neil are right
> about checking parents on an axis-by-axis basis. My desire to do this comes
> from an incomplete understanding of what "parent" means in LilyPond sp
Hello,
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of
mts...@gmail.com [mts...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 July 2011 19:22
To: pkx1...@gmail.com; gra...@percival-music.ca; n.putt..
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1038
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1038: where the @code{\markup
@{in
Pushed: cf2da187b5b99e963346e5944311bb77e2e52ff1
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664076/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664070/diff/8001/lily/clef.cc
File lily/clef.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4664070/diff/8001/lily/clef.cc#newcode51
lily/clef.cc:51: str = str + "_" + clef_style;
you can't add clef_style unless you know glyph == "clefs.G"
http://codereview.appspot.com
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1105
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1105:
A way to make them not colli
2011/7/17 Janek Warchoł :
> I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc
> but found nothing...
You don't need to know this (though if you're curious, any grob
without a default is set to ly:grob::stencil-width; see the
constructor in grob.cc).
If you want to know the ext
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/diff/8001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1024
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1024: for top-level @code{\markup}
I've paired this down to a minimal implementation that only contains:
1) Init file stuff for syntax (this could be made much better...)
2) Modifications to the glissando engraver to ID glissando stems.
3) A function that links them up to glissandi in stem.hh
4) The triggering of this function via
LGTM. Maybe wait a day for Trevor to comment, then push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4751045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 03:59:37PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From:
> >During a recent sudo make install I got this error. I'm not sure
> >if it has to do with recent pushes in the python code, but I
> >figured I'd pass it along:
>
> Mike - is this only with make in
2011/7/17 Carl Sorensen :
> On 7/16/11 5:37 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 05:13:29PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO, we should be aiming at one commit per Rietveld issue, rather than a
>>> series of commits per Rietveld issue.
>>
>> That's beside the point, at
On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From:
> To: ; ;
> ;
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Adds redirect-lilypond-output option to
> lilypond-book(issue4664060)
>
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> During a recent sudo make install I got this er
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: ; ;
; ;
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Adds redirect-lilypond-output option to
lilypond-book(issue4664060)
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
;
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Adds redirec
I've searched in note-head.cc, note-column.cc, note-heads-engraver.cc
but found nothing...
If i knew this i could probably fix
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1546
Thanks in advance,
Janek
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
;
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Adds redirect-lilypond-output option to
lilypond-book(issue4664060)
Hey all,
During a recent sudo make install I got this error. I'm not sure if it
has to do with recent pushes in the python c
Hey all,
During a recent sudo make install I got this error. I'm not sure if it has to
do with recent pushes in the python code, but I figured I'd pass it along:
Compiling
/Users/mikesolomon/devel/lilypond/Documentation/out/notation/notation.texi...
/Users/mikesolomon/devel/lilypond/Documentat
On 2011/07/17 10:35:20, Janek Warchol wrote:
Hi all,
as acting Frog Meister i'm worried that nothing happens here :(
Wol, how can i help you?
Neil, Carl: do i understand correctly that Wol could've done this
using a more elegant solution, but nevertheless his patch doesn't
brake anything and w
Hi all,
as acting Frog Meister i'm worried that nothing happens here :(
Wol, how can i help you?
Neil, Carl: do i understand correctly that Wol could've done this
using a more elegant solution, but nevertheless his patch doesn't
brake anything and works correctly (i don't remember any problems whe
2011/7/17 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> On So., 17. Jul. 2011 09:41:02 CEST, Jan Warchoł
> wrote:
>
>> 2011/7/17 David Kastrup :
>> > Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
>> > > There is no particular reason I used a scaled regular clef, IIRC. We
>> > > might just as well use a scaled change clef... Feel free to
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hi,
breve glyphs in Feta font need modification.
What is bad now: breves lying between the stafflines form a
hard-to-recognize clump, partly because the corners (marked in orange
here:
http://lilypond.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=1767000&name=breve+dimensions.p
On So., 17. Jul. 2011 09:41:02 CEST, Jan Warchoł
wrote:
> 2011/7/17 David Kastrup :
> > Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> > > There is no particular reason I used a scaled regular clef, IIRC. We
> > > might just as well use a scaled change clef... Feel free to change
> > > that.
> >
> > What clef t
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
>>I think there should be an option to turn it all back on if you want
>>- a sort of inverse of QUIET_BUILD. We should also get rid of the
>>QUIET_BUILD variable completely.
>
>Agreed. Maybe using the V=1 thing that Jan was talking about?
2011/7/17 David Kastrup :
> Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
>
>> On Sa., 16. Jul. 2011 21:05:37 CEST, Janek Warchoł
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/7/16 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
>>> > 2011/7/15 Janek Warchoł :
>>> > > Surprisingly, CueClef currently uses regular clef glyph scaled down
>>> > > 1.5874 times (font-size
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 07:35:50PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Now Bertrand's repository doesn't have one commit on this branch, he has
> three or four commits on his branch. And the first two or three are not
> right -- they haven't passed code review.
oh, I see. I personally always just modi
Finally - new patch set uploaded.
Now it's possible to easily switch between different tremolo behaviours.
'Style' property is no longer used to choose between rectangular and
beam-like slashes - this is now done using 'shape' property.
'Style' property now influences both 'shape' and 'slope' of t
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> On Sa., 16. Jul. 2011 21:05:37 CEST, Janek Warchoł
> wrote:
>
>> 2011/7/16 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
>> > 2011/7/15 Janek Warchoł :
>> > > Surprisingly, CueClef currently uses regular clef glyph scaled down
>> > > 1.5874 times (font-size -4), not a scaled down change clef.
30 matches
Mail list logo
