Reviewers: ,
Message:
Marc Hohl has prepared a patch for mandolin predefined fretboards.
The patch looks good to me.
Please review.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4384055/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (righ
Instead of adding a property, is there a way to just make the default
value of the property be staff_space?
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4385053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
Instead of adding a property, is there a way to just make the default
value of the property be staff_space?
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4385053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 07:41:51PM +, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
> New patch set uploaded w/ a regtest.
Thanks added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1608
> Before I push, could someone please run the regtests on this patch?
I haven't checked it yet, but at least it's in th
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:57:30PM +, James Lowe wrote:
> This one is missing (I think).
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-04/msg00121.html
>
> This was the one sent by Mark Hohl to Carl, but I didn't see
> anything done
Thanks added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypo
Hi Bernardo,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2011-03-29, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> I think we might need some little changes to compile lilypond with gcc 4.
>> I'm getting the following errors with latest git.
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/gjsLv0Fe
>
> My guess is that th
New patch set uploaded w/ a regtest.
Before I push, could someone please run the regtests on this patch? I
got an anomaly in partcombine-midi.ly, but I don't know if that's
because I messed up the regest or if in fact my code is buggy. I'm
tending to think the former, as when I compile this fil
5th Draft, nothing to really check (apart from Marks 3 spacing edits)
but have removed the ly file now pushed in commit
524f726a5de0033e68525c65e58430de9b60b7ca
So this is just some admin work so I know that the latest iteration of
the patch is here.
http://codereview.appspot.com/412405
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 08:35:54AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> We have a standard problem "bugfix should have regtest" which is not
>> working all too well. If the responsibilities for bugfix and regtest
>> get decoupled, this might help. After all, most bug reports
Graham,
From: Listengine [listeng...@mx1.tuxfamily.net] on behalf of Graham Percival
[gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 09 April 2011 01:00
To: Lily devel
Cc: fr...@lilynet.net
Subject: [frogs] PATCHES: anything lost?
Here's the current patches list:
http://
Pushed as commit53390e0570f4544c131e77323cdc4f4ea738bddd
http://codereview.appspot.com/4388041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Wow -- what a quick response! Thanks!
I have a couple of comments.
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4385053/diff/1/scm/define-grob-properties.scm
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4385053/diff/1/scm/define-grob-properties.scm#newcode61
scm/define-g
Pushed as commit
71e0343fdf2a1936b07db0a5892155351c72d553
http://codereview.appspot.com/4368049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Potential fix for issue 1604.
Description:
Allows users to prevent rests from automatically shifting.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/4385053/
Affected files:
M lily/multi-measure-rest.cc
M scm/define-grob-properties.scm
M scm/define-grobs.scm
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/4387046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 08:35:54AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> We have a standard problem "bugfix should have regtest" which is not
> working all too well. If the responsibilities for bugfix and regtest
> get decoupled, this might help. After all, most bug reports already
> require a demonstrat
16 matches
Mail list logo