On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:19:46 -0700, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Keith OHara schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 13:50 [-0700]:
Dynamics are newly implemented as note-on-velocity,
but the old implementation as channel-volume is still there,
What would the correct fix be?
Well, MIDI note-on-velocity i
Neil Puttock gmail.com> writes:
>
> Interesting. I was on the right track, but it appears to be deleting
> something which has already been deleted:
>
> Audio_staff*
> Staff_performer::new_audio_staff (string voice)
[..]
>
> In baerenreiter-sarabande.ly, there's an unnamed voice (I'm not sure
On 14 March 2011 23:26, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> backtrace from valgrind, also after balloon.ly
[snip]
Interesting. I was on the right track, but it appears to be deleting
something which has already been deleted:
Audio_staff*
Staff_performer::new_audio_staff (string voice)
{
Audio_st
On Mar 14, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 14 March 2011 22:19, Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:27:06PM -0400, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>> I am having trouble getting a clean baseline from the regtests, and trying
>>> to grep the culprit is, for some odd reas
James Lowe wrote Friday, March 11, 2011 11:34 PM
From: Trevor Daniels [t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
I just noticed that none of the new spacing properties
in spacing.itely have @funindex entries. These are
needed so people can follow-up error messages like
"staff-affinities should only decrease"
On 14 March 2011 22:19, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:27:06PM -0400, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> I am having trouble getting a clean baseline from the regtests, and trying
>> to grep the culprit is, for some odd reason, taking several minutes. Could
>> someone please r
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:27:06PM -0400, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> I am having trouble getting a clean baseline from the regtests, and trying to
> grep the culprit is, for some odd reason, taking several minutes. Could
> someone please run the regtests on the current master and confirm if
Jan Nieuwenhuizen schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 22:19 [+0100]:
> Keith OHara schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 13:50 [-0700]:
> > (Unfortunately for me, the player I formerly used, NotationPlayer,
> > gets confused by Tracks with no program change containing notes
> > directed to a Channel that had an ear
Keith OHara schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 13:50 [-0700]:
> Dynamics are newly implemented as note-on-velocity,
> but the old implementation as channel-volume is still there, causing
> instruments of the same type to partially influence each others'
> loudness.
What would the correct fix be? What t
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 02:14:14 -0700, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Keith OHara schreef op zo 13-03-2011 om 17:05 [-0700]:
Sensible, but this leaves a partially-finished major change in the
branch that Graham just tagged as 2.14 release candidate.
What's partial about the change?
Nothing cr
Hey all,
I am having trouble getting a clean baseline from the regtests, and trying to
grep the culprit is, for some odd reason, taking several minutes. Could
someone please run the regtests on the current master and confirm if there is
an issue?
Cheers,
MS
___
Reinhold Kainhofer schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 14:42 [+0100]:
> Yes, but my main concern is not to use midi2ly on files generated by lilypond
> in the first place.
Fair enough. My concern is mainly the MIDI->ly traject, in combination
with adding a combined test suite. Until now, MIDI has been
> The only change i propose in this area is making shortened 8th stem
> shorter by 0.25 ss. In my opinion shorter stem fits 8th notes
> better, and this will solve attached "problem.png".
This is OK with me. We need to discuss stem lengths again anyway if
someone is walking over the beaming code
Jan Nieuwenhuizen schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 12:45 [+0100]:
Reinhold,
To follow-up on my request for actual failing .ly's -- I've just added
an initial lyrics test
\score {
<<
\relative c'' {
\key g \major
\time 6/8
d4 b8 c4 a8 | d4 b8 g4
}
\addlyrics {
Gir
On Mar 13, 2011, at 10:30 PM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc
> File lily/beam.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc#newcode206
> lily/beam.cc:206: orig->set_property ("feather-fraction", scm_cons
Reinhold Kainhofer schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 10:49 [+0100]:
Hi Reinold,
> There are some problems with the new method:
>
> -) All staves with \partcombine now use four (!) different midi tracks:
> shared,
> one, two and solo (because partcombine internally uses four voices)
Yes, is that a p
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, February 02, 2011 7:42 PM
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:37:43AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:28 PM
>If you mean "why can't I be set to be the owner of this issue",
>then... I couldn't set it to you with the @go
Am Montag, 14. März 2011, um 10:21:53 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
> Keith OHara schreef op zo 13-03-2011 om 21:55 [-0700]:
> > I don't know of any yet, and I will not be looking for any.
> > The changes within the past week were significant enough that I expect
> > complaints from people who use MID
On Mar 13, 2011, at 10:30 PM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc
> File lily/beam.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc#newcode206
> lily/beam.cc:206: orig->set_property ("feather-fraction", scm_cons
Keith OHara schreef op zo 13-03-2011 om 00:19 [-0800]:
> The MIDI port assignments are still being written to the output file;
> I don't know if that is intended.
Fix pushed.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://Ava
Keith OHara schreef op zo 13-03-2011 om 21:55 [-0700]:
> I don't know of any yet, and I will not be looking for any.
> The changes within the past week were significant enough that I expect
> complaints from people who use MIDI.
That would be nice! Esp. if they send patches. MIDI support in
Lil
Keith OHara schreef op zo 13-03-2011 om 17:05 [-0700]:
> Sensible, but this leaves a partially-finished major change in the
> branch that Graham just tagged as 2.14 release candidate.
What's partial about the change? Also, the old behaviour
should be mostly reproducible by setting midiChannelMap
On Thu 10 Mar 2011, 14:41 Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:27:33PM +, James Lowe wrote:
> > ---tiny example---
>
> Perfect!
>
> > \version "2.13.53"
> >
> > { c1^\markup { \sans "word" } }
> >
> > ---snip---
> >
> > Gives the following error in the log
>
> Bug Squad: pr
23 matches
Mail list logo
