>> well, 2*radius+2 then? Anything that indicates how this number is
>> formed is ok.
>
> Ah, sorry. I missed what you meant.
> Well, this nuber is not formed :) It shouldn't depend on
> staff_radius. This number determines what the steepness of
> transition should be (i.e., what the angle of t
2011/2/27 Han-Wen Nienhuys
>
> 2011/2/26 Janek Warchoł :
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc#newcode360
> >> lily/stem.cc:360: Real shortening_step = min (max (0.25,
> >> (shorten_property / 6)), 0.5);
> >> shouldnt 6 be 2*staff_radius+1 ?
> >
> > No, radius of default st
2011/2/26 Janek Warchoł :
http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc#newcode360
>> lily/stem.cc:360: Real shortening_step = min (max (0.25,
>> (shorten_property / 6)), 0.5);
>> shouldnt 6 be 2*staff_radius+1 ?
>
> No, radius of default staff is 2, so 2*staff_radius+1 = 5 != 6
well,
2011/2/25
> LGTM
>
> just cosmetics.
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc
> File lily/stem.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4210051/diff/1/lily/stem.cc#newcode336
> lily/stem.cc:336: SCM s = ly_assoc_get (ly_symbol2scm ("lengths"),
> details, SCM_EOL);
> ca
Am Samstag, 26. Februar 2011, um 21:01:40 schrieben Sie:
> A question for Reinhold, though:
> do I gather correctly that \partcombine is applied to a Staff, and turns
> the combining mechanism on, while \partcombineAutomatic is applied to a
> single Voice?
Not really. When part-combining does its
On 2011/02/26 20:01:39, Colin Campbell wrote:
I like that very much, James, thanks! A question for Reinhold,
though: do I
gather correctly that \partcombine is applied to a Staff, and turns
the
combining mechanism on, while \partcombineAutomatic is applied to a
single
Voice? That being so
Actually thinking about it more would it make more sense to have the
auto
function listed first then add the words "... May need some manual
adjustment.'
and then list the rest?
James
I like that very much, James, thanks! A question for Reinhold, though:
do I gather correctly that \par
On 25 February 2011 22:53, wrote:
> On 2011/02/25 20:37:37, Neil Puttock wrote:
>>
>> This reinvents the wheel a bit. :)
>
>> (define-markup-command (draw-hline layout props)
>> ()
>> #:category graphic
>> #:properties ((draw-line-markup)
>> (line-width))
>> (interpret-ma
On 2/26/11 9:45 AM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
> On 26 February 2011 17:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Finally, regarding your question about scaling note heads. It is possible
>> to scale a note head differently in x and y if you are using it in a markup,
>> but as far as I know, there is no way
On 26 February 2011 17:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> Finally, regarding your question about scaling note heads. It is possible
> to scale a note head differently in x and y if you are using it in a markup,
> but as far as I know, there is no way to scale it differently in x and y as
> a note head
On 2/26/11 4:18 AM, "James Lowe" wrote:
> Hello
>
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
> [lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Tim
> Sheasby [t...@sheafpublishing.co.za]
> Sent: 26 February 2011 10:07
Hello,
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of
pkx1...@gmail.com [pkx1...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 February 2011 06:52
To: colinpkcampb...@gmail.com; reinhold.kainho...@g
Hello
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Tim
Sheasby [t...@sheafpublishing.co.za]
Sent: 26 February 2011 10:07
To: lilypond-u...@gnu.org
Subject: MF fonts
Need t
13 matches
Mail list logo
