2011/2/21 Graham Percival
> Marek, it would be great if you could continue doing this -- note
> that I've changed the policy to be "add it ASAP", not "add it
> after 3 days".
>
I can continue with "adding patches" according to the new guidelines.
Marek
__
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On 18/02/11 02:13, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
>> LGTM.
>>
>> Can you email me your patch so I can apply it?
>
> Here's the patch.
I retested everything, and the patch checks out just fine. I've pushed it.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
I'm looking for volunteers to be "patch handlers" or "patch
helpers" (or some other name).
Description is in CG 8.6 Patch handling if you have the latest
git master, or here if you don't:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling.html
I'll be Path Meister for now,
http://codereview.appspot.com/4167063
I got it up to a semi-unembarassing state. You can the same .ly I sent out to
the list previously to test it. It draws a line now whenever there are
footnotes and takes this line's Y extent into account for the page breaking
algorithm.
Cheers,
MS
___
Hi all,
A year ago, I added a section to the CG about having mentors for contributors:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/mentors
Sadly, it didn't take off -- I took on two doc contributors (just like
the Grand Documentation Project, albeit on a small scale), but there
were
Hi all,
Many new contributors look through our google issue tracker to find an
open issue, then start working on it. One person recently did this,
sent in a very nice patch, but then it turned out that the issue
(which I had added) was actually invalid.
This is extremely unfortunate, to say the
On 2/19/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Also, could we dispense on esthetic changes on developer-only
> parts (like the regtest) ?
This was not an esthetic proposal. I honestly (but mistakenly!)
thought that the lack of complete bars made the spacing more fragile,
which made it harder to spot actu
On 2/19/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The regtest also compares for memory and cpu use, but this test does
> not work very well.
>
> We should probably disable it by default.
The cpu regtest *is* disabled by default. We're considering a patch
to re-enable it:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/is
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 06:31:09PM -0500, Mike Solomon wrote:
> I've sketched out the following code for footnotes in Lilypond (thank you
> very much Joe for your suggestions!).
Thanks, added here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=737
The issue claims to have a bounty from Jiri
2011/2/20 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> This change is default over current lily, so let's put it in. I can't
this change is an improvement over current lily
[time to go to bed, I guess]
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_
2011/2/13 Janek Warchoł :
> This is the first part of a series of changes to the stems and flags.
> The suggested change is small, but in my opinion important.
> Look at the attached "transition testing.pdf" - it illustrates the problem:
> the 'b' stem is definately too short (it should not end at
Hey all,
I've sketched out the following code for footnotes in Lilypond (thank you very
much Joe for your suggestions!).
If people could please apply the attached patch, run the attached ly file just
to make sure it works, and then play around with it, your suggestions would be
appreciated. I
lgtm, passes regtests, please push.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4187054/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:47:17PM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Graham (or any TeX wizard)
~
That's not me, then!
> make doc was failing for me with
>
> TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [save size=5000].
>
> I hacked etc/texmf/texmf.cnf to increase save size,
> which all
On 2011/02/17 22:49:07, Graham Percival wrote:
Neil's fix for a critical crash with markuplines.
What's not to love?
It is recognizable even to a non-lexer like me as an illegal-value trap,
and it uses the same scm_is_pair idiom as similar tests in this file.
http://codereview.appspot.com/41
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Italian team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/it.po
(We can arrange things so tha
2011/2/20 Graham Percival
>
> On 2/13/11, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> >
> > This is the first part of a series of changes to the stems and flags.
> > The suggested change is small, but in my opinion important.
>
> Thanks you for creating such an excellent report on the matter. You
> took the time to
Lgtm
http://codereview.appspot.com/4187054/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi Patrick,
On 18/02/11 02:13, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> Can you email me your patch so I can apply it?
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/2219044/
Here's the patch.
Cheers,
Ian
>From d5854eabd3618476bc0cd06eb09effba68806acd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Huli
The DynamicTextSpanner grob was missing the springs-and-rods callback, so
setting minimum-length didn't have any effect so far. Here's the fix:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4187054
Okay to push?
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
--
Reinhold Kai
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys"
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: a present for Graham
2011/2/19 Graham Percival
Cheers,
- Graham
PS one kiss -- on the cheek, mind you -- is yours, if you come to
Glasg
On 2/13/11, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>
> This is the first part of a series of changes to the stems and flags.
> The suggested change is small, but in my opinion important.
Thanks you for creating such an excellent report on the matter. You
took the time to create two alternative solutions, with pdf
Just minor stuff for the NR.
all implemented.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4173065/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
23 matches
Mail list logo
