interesting warnin regarding staff-affinities

2011-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
The MusicXML test file 71f-AllChordTypes (and other MusicXML files also) produces zillions of this warning: staff-affinities should only decrease What does it mean? The output seems to be fine... Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypon

analyzing warning messages from log file

2011-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, while walking through the log file I see many warnings for lilypond input files. Some of them are part of the regression test, but some not. An example for the former is, I think In repeat-unfold.ly: warning: More alternatives than repeats. Junking excess alternatives and her a

compilation issue with font-name-font-size.ly

2011-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
During compilation of font-name-font-size.ly I get this message: [century_schoolbook_l_serif_3.865234375] [new_century_schoolbook_3.865234375] warning: no PostScript font name for font `/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/ncenR24-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz' warning: FreeType face has no PostScript font name

Re: global staff-staff spacing fails in 2.13.46

2011-01-15 Thread Keith OHara
James Worlton gmail.com> writes: The following code compiles, but the spacing override in the layout block fails. The layout block code was copied and pasted into my test directly from the NR 4.4.1 "Within-system spacing properties". ... \override VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-staff-spacing #'b

Re: horizontal spacing regression

2011-01-15 Thread Keith OHara
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:26:47 -0800, Keith OHara wrote: On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:20:15 -0800, Joe Neeman wrote: I think you'll find that the regression was caused by ee0488, Yes. Reverting the commit to fix 1120, from current master : [...] + and for some reason correctly spaces notes with me

Re: why chords with notes of different duration is not supported?

2011-01-15 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:58:15PM +, Neil Puttock wrote: >> On 14 January 2011 21:04, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> > Sometimes I am inclined to just commit and be done.  After all, this >> > would just omit a warning in working cases, and would fix the totally >> >

more junk in the log file

2011-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Another issue which is new since a few months, and which makes the log file even more noisy: Some strings are printed twice, for no apparent reason, e.g. ... Parsing... Using `nederlands' note names... Using `nederlands' note names... Renaming input to: `tie-direction-manual.ly' ...

Re: why chords with notes of different duration is not supported?

2011-01-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:58:15PM +, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 14 January 2011 21:04, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Sometimes I am inclined to just commit and be done.  After all, this > > would just omit a warning in working cases, and would fix the totally > > broken warning message when breve

minor nitpick: zillions of [] in logfile

2011-01-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Saying `make doc' and diverting stdin and stderr to a file, I see messages like this: ... [/usr/local/home/wl/git/lilypond.compiled/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/predefined-fretboards-init.ly] [/usr/local/home/wl/git/lilypond.compiled/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/string-tunings-init.ly Usi

Re: instrumentName in StaffGroup

2011-01-15 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 14 January 2011 20:56, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > To be honest, I don't understand, why the Instrument_name_engraver is not > added to all staff group contexts by default. It is a very simple engraver, so > it would not induce much overhead. And it does not have any side effects. On > the ot

Re: Optical spacing fails at tight situations

2011-01-15 Thread Janek Warchoł
2011/1/14 Carl Sorensen : > On 1/13/11 2:16 PM, "Janek Warchoł" > wrote: >> >> The distances are not equal. Optical corrections are made there. >> > OK, you got me interested so I spent some time I didn't have on this.  I > must be a LilyPond addict. :) I'm becoming one, too :) > It appears that

Re: instrumentName in StaffGroup

2011-01-15 Thread Jan Warchoł
2011/1/14 Reinhold Kainhofer : > To be honest, I don't understand, why the Instrument_name_engraver is not > added to all staff group contexts by default. It is a very simple engraver, so > it would not induce much overhead. > From a user's point of view, if he sets an instrument name, he wants it