Carl Sorensen writes:
> If we are going to move to a list for alterations, the list should probably
> be rationals, rather than integers, in order to be most general. Thus it
> should most likely be (1/2 -1/4), rather than (1 -1).
In that case, it would appear that "alteration" as a separate co
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 30. Dezember 2010, um 20:35:57 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> > It seems that if you specify both systems-per-page and page-count, then
> > lilypond will disregard page-count. Instead of stretching the notes, it
> > will si
On 12/29/10 4:32 PM, "Janek Warchoł"
wrote:
> 2010/12/29 Carl Sorensen :
>> In such a case, there are different standards, we apply both, with a
>> variable to choose between the different behaviors. That's why we have
>> different accidental behaviors.
>
> And that's very good indeed! But s
On 12/30/10 3:55 PM, "Felipe Gonçalves Assis"
wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
>>
>> Hi, Felipe.
>>
>> I've looked at your patch, but I'm having a bit of trouble seeing how the
>> patch resolves the issues that are identified in issue 1278.
>>
>> I must admit that i've not yet fully understood Hans's e
2010/12/28 Trevor Daniels
>
> Janek Warchoł wrote Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:28 PM
>> I wouldn't describe this behaviour as "packing notes as tightly as
>> possible" - the first note gets enormous amount of space. Don't you
>> think that packed-spacing is bugged itself?
>
> No. The space after
Hi Carl,
>
> Hi, Felipe.
>
> I've looked at your patch, but I'm having a bit of trouble seeing how the
> patch resolves the issues that are identified in issue 1278.
>
> I must admit that i've not yet fully understood Hans's emails on issue 1278.
>
> How do your new two-element alterations improve
So, first question
1. How should we represent alterations?
It is clear to me that the most general representation would be as
a list of integers of arbitrary length (see sections 1 and 2 of the
attachment).
However, a fixed length list might be more realistic. In my patch,
I opted for a pair of
On 12/30/10 2:07 PM, "Felipe Gonçalves Assis"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Issue 1278 (http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1278)
> clarified that, in order to support some microtonal notations, LilyPond
> needs to use a different pitch representation.
>
> I am willing to make that happ
Trevor Daniels treda.co.uk> writes:
> Graham Percival wrote Thursday, December 30, 2010 3:56 AM
> >
> > I want to keep the word "intentionally", though -- if something
> > only happened to work because of a happy coincidence of bugs, then
> > "breaking" that should not be a Critical bug.
>
> I'm
Hello,
Issue 1278 (http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1278)
clarified that, in order to support some microtonal notations, LilyPond
needs to use a different pitch representation.
I am willing to make that happen. Of course, this will require some
contribution from more experienced
It seems that if you specify both systems-per-page and page-count, then
lilypond will disregard page-count. Instead of stretching the notes, it will
simply use less pages than desired and cram the notes together.
Minimal example attached. Lilypond will always use 2 pages (with 3 systems
each) r
While workign on some real-world score, I ran into another problem with part-
combining that I don't know how to solve:
Sometimes in a part-combined staff, after a multi-measure rest, one of the two
instruments sets in a little earlier than the second one. During that measure,
the second instrum
Hi.
I am the author of the bagpipe.ly mode included in the Lilypond
distribution. I'm sorry I haven't been very visible here the last
several years. I haven't had much user feedback for the bagpipe mode,
although I know there are people out there using it.
However, I have fiddled around with it f
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 11:42 +, James Lowe wrote:
>
>
> From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
> [lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Marc
> Hohl [m...@hohlart.de]
> Sent: 29 December 2010 18:25
> To: carl
James Lowe writes:
> Am 29.12.2010 19:22, schrieb Marc Hohl:
>> [...]
>> But for duitar,
> I meant "guitar", of course - don't know how a "duitar" is tuned and
> played ;-)
>
> With gifficulty I expect!
Good thing that the Unisys gif patents expired already, so support in
Lilypond should not be
From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Marc Hohl
[m...@hohlart.de]
Sent: 29 December 2010 18:25
To: carl.d.soren...@gmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org;
re...@codereview.a
On 12/29/2010 11:31 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:08:42PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2010 10:11 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
I there any documentation I can view?
>>> Only the source, sorry.
>>>
>>>
>> It seems that
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, December 30, 2010 3:56 AM
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:32:56PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
From: "Carl Sorensen"
>On 12/28/10 4:18 PM, "Graham Percival"
> wrote:
>
>The difference between Phil's version and the previous version
>is
>
>"Something that worked as i
18 matches
Mail list logo
