On 10/13/10 2:40 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 10/13/10 8:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>>
David Kastrup writes:
>
>
> So my fear is that the new scheme is both strictly logical, and not
> useful for
Valentin Villenave wrote Wednesday, October 13, 2010 4:03 PM
Hi Trevor, here's a minor patch for Vocal music. Nothing too
extraordinary so far, I quite like what you've done!
I've done about a third of the file, I plan to work on the rest
later
(though it may have to wait for a while :)
G
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 10/13/10 8:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> Carl Sorensen writes:
>>
>>> David Kastrup writes:
>>>
So my fear is that the new scheme is both strictly logical, and not
useful for specifying a coherent document layout.
>>>
>>> But the new sch
On 2010/10/12 06:23:56, dak wrote:
mailto:percival.music...@gmail.com writes:
Is that not a documentation string rather than a regexp? And the top
level meaning is a string meaning, anyway, not a regexp one?
Yes, sorry. I now see that all these changes are in the
documentation strings; the
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:24 PM, James wrote:
> \layout {
> interscoreline = 1
> ...
> }
git grep interscoreline
produces nothing obvious -- although notably, there are no lily/ or
scm/ files containing the string. I suspect that it was an old
property that was never removed.
Looking at gitk,
Hello,
Can anyone tell me what
\layout {
interscoreline = 1
...
}
Does?
This is in a couple of Doc @LilyPond examples
However if I try to compile the example with this explicit line
commented in or out it does not seem to do anything in 2.13.35
Thank you for your time.
James
_
On 10/13/10 8:29 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> So my fear is that the new scheme is both strictly logical, and not
>>> useful for specifying a coherent document layout.
>>
>> But the new scheme is just a restatement (renamin
> "Valentin" == Valentin Villenave writes:
Valentin> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:01 PM, David Kastrup
wrote:
>> why are longas treated specially?
Valentin> Though I don't know how to answer that question, I suspect
Valentin> the answer might help solve
Valentin> http://cod
On 12/10/2010 11:59 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
This patch *looks* appropriate to me, but I haven't tested it, and I'm not
sure exactly how I would test it.
Pavel, do you have a test file that can work with the patch so we can
demonstrate it works properly?
Here's one, try running it through lily
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I've just pushed a patch to NR 2.1 Vocal music which provides a first draft
> for the last of the blank sections marked TBC ("To Be Completed"). I
> believe it's now in a much better shape than it was, even though much of the
> chapter is in
Carl Sorensen writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>
>>
>> So my fear is that the new scheme is both strictly logical, and not
>> useful for specifying a coherent document layout.
>
> But the new scheme is just a restatement (renaming) of the current
> scheme.
The renaming moves from a document
David Kastrup writes:
>
>
> So my fear is that the new scheme is both strictly logical, and not
> useful for specifying a coherent document layout.
But the new scheme is just a restatement (renaming) of the current scheme.
Mark is not trying to *redo* the document layout algorithms; he's tryi
David Kastrup writes:
> Mark Polesky writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>> The main problem I see with that naming scheme is that it
>>> does not reflect score sheet design, but the current
>>> implementation.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> So the proposed scheme ties something presented as document
>>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
