On 2010/08/28 19:16:18, Ian Hulin wrote:
Patrick and Neil, do I have to fix all the compatibility
problems in all the scm files loaded by lily.scm in order
to push what we have so far?
No. Some of the other compatibility problems are quite complicated and
deserve their own separate issues.
P
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050/diff/17001/18001
File input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050/diff/17001/18001#newcode5
input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly:5: texidoc = "uses
define-event-class to create a fully f
My comments in define-event-classes.scm don't work, so here goes:
+(define-public (define-event-class leaf heritage)
+ (cond
+ ((not (eq? leaf (car heritage)))
+ (ly:warning "All classes must be the last in their matrilineal
line."))
(ly:warning (_ "...") for translations
+ ((not (equal? (cdr he
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050/diff/17001/18001
File input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050/diff/17001/18001#newcode201
input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly:201: a b c \schemeTextSpannerEnd
d |
+ another spanner to check ly:engraver-annou
Hi Mike,
I don't trust Rietveld not to swallow my comments, so I'm posting a few
at a time just in case it breaks again. :)
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050/diff/17001/18001
File input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1867050/diff/1700
On 2010/08/28 19:16:18, Ian Hulin wrote:
Anyhow, building against V1.9.11 showed up Neil's concerns with the
code
in lily.scm/simple-format-handler and /ergonomic-simple-format and I
have a fix for this. It looks like the byte-compiler in Guile V1.9.11
is stricter than the interpreter in V1.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
This was the artist formerly known as tracker 1055.
Status so far.
The patch runs OK against guile V1.8,7. I've now been able to run
against Guile 1.9.11 on a V M despite having to rebuild my machine
because the CPU ran hot and toasted itsel
Hello all,
A few queries related to my ongoing project to implement customizable
transposition/naturalization styles.
It was suggested to me to use music properties to set the rules. I've
come to the conclusion that this may not be the right approach. Why?
Because as far as I can see music prop
On 28 August 2010 16:31, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 28/08/10 16:17, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> On 28 August 2010 15:36, Wols Lists wrote:
>>
>>> When you add chords using chordmode, clicking on the resulting chord in
>>> the pdf doesn't take you to the relevant place in the source file. In
>>> fact, it
On 28 August 2010 15:36, Wols Lists wrote:
> When you add chords using chordmode, clicking on the resulting chord in
> the pdf doesn't take you to the relevant place in the source file. In
> fact, it fails pretty badly ...
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1022
Cheers,
Neil
__
I've tried to report this to lily-bugs via gmane, but I sent it
yesterday and it's not showing up there ... has it got lost?
When you add chords using chordmode, clicking on the resulting chord in
the pdf doesn't take you to the relevant place in the source file. In
fact, it fails pretty badly ..
11 matches
Mail list logo
